Cited by 72Face Recognition and PerceptionSocial Robot Interaction and HRIAesthetic Perception and Analysis

Perceptual discrimination difficulty and familiarity in the Uncanny Valley: more like a “Happy Valley”

Open access
Cheetham, Marcus, Suter, Pascal, Jancke, Lutz·2014·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

The Uncanny Valley Hypothesis (UVH) predicts that greater difficulty perceptually discriminating between categorically ambiguous human and humanlike characters (e.g., highly realistic robot) evokes negatively valenced (i.e., uncanny) affect. An ABX perceptual discrimination task and signal detection analysis was used to examine the profile of perceptual discrimination (PD) difficulty along the UVH' dimension of human likeness (DHL). This was represented using avatar-to-human morph continua. Rejecting the implicitly assumed profile of PD difficulty underlying the UVH' prediction, Experiment 1 showed that PD difficulty was reduced for categorically ambiguous faces but, notably, enhanced for human faces. Rejecting the UVH' predicted relationship between PD difficulty and negative affect (assessed in terms of the UVH' familiarity dimension), Experiment 2 demonstrated that greater PD difficulty correlates with more positively valenced affect. Critically, this effect was strongest for the ambiguous faces, suggesting a correlative relationship between PD difficulty and feelings of familiarity more consistent with the metaphor happy valley. This relationship is also consistent with a fluency amplification instead of the hitherto proposed hedonic fluency account of affect along the DHL. Experiment 3 found no evidence that the asymmetry in the profile of PD along the DHL is attributable to a differential processing bias (cf. other-race effect), i.e., processing avatars at a category level but human faces at an individual level. In conclusion, the present data for static faces show clear effects that, however, strongly challenge the UVH' implicitly assumed profile of PD difficulty along the DHL and the predicted relationship between this and feelings of familiarity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01219

Cites

100 of 100 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hanson D. (2006). Exploring the aesthetic range for humanoid robots, in Proceedings of the ICCS/CogSci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science (Vancouver), 39– 42.
  2. MacDorman K. F. (2006). Subjective ratings of robot video clips for human likeness, familiarity, and eeriness: an exploration of the uncanny valley [electronic resource], in ICCS/CogSci-2006 Long Symposium: Toward Social Mechanisms of Android Science (Vancouver).
  3. Ramey C. H. (2005). The uncanny valley of similarities concerning abortion, baldness, heaps of sand, and humanlike robots, in Paper Presented at the Proceedings of Views of the Uncanny Valley Workshop: IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, (Tsukuba).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cheetham, M., Suter, P., & Jancke, L.
Affiliations
University of Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Cheetham, Marcus
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2014-11-19
Volume
5
Pages
1219-1219
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034061440
Cited by
72
References
99
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 12
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
European Commission (27731)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
Keywords
uncanny valley, human-likeness, familiarity, emotional valence, Happy Valley, robot faces, other-race effect, signal detection analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review