Cited by 147Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsMarriage and Sexual Relationships

“Hooking Up” at College: Does Religion Make a Difference?

Burdette, Amy M., Ellison, Christopher G., Hill, Terrence D., Glenn, Norval D.·2009·Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion

Abstract

Recent attention from media, scholars, and religious leadership has focused on the dating activities of college students, particularly in relation to casual physical encounters or what some have termed “hooking up.” In this article, we examine the impact of both individual and institutional religious involvement on “hooking up” in a national sample of college women (N= 1,000). The results of our analysis reveal several important patterns. First, Catholic college women are more likely to have “hooked up” while at school than college women with no religious affiliation. Second, conservative Protestant college women are less likely to have “hooked up” while at school than college women with no religious affiliation; however, this difference is mediated or explained by church attendance, which is protective against “hooking up.” Finally, women who attend colleges and universities with a Catholic affiliation are more likely to have hooked up while at school than women who attend academic institutions with no religious affiliation, net of individual‐level religious involvement.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01464.x

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sex among the more religious is far more likely to occur within long-term relationships, less rapidly, after more commitment, and with fewer partners than less- or nonreligious individuals.

    “sex among the more religious is far more likely to occur within long-term relationships, less rapidly, after more commitment, and with fewer partners than less- or nonreligious individuals (Burdette, Ellison, Hill, & Glenn, 2009; Laumann, Gagnon, Michael, & Michaels, 1994; Regnerus & Uecker, 2011)”
  • Of the 50 highest-quality risky sexual activity studies, 42 (84%) reported inverse relationships and none found a positive one.

    “Of the 50 highest quality studies, 42 (84%) reported inverse relationships [333–343] and none found a positive one.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Burdette, A. M., Ellison, C. G., Hill, T. D., & Glenn, N. D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Burdette, Amy M.
Venue
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-09
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
535-551
ISSN
  • 0021-8294 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-5906
OpenAlex
W1985122610
Cited by
147
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Keywords
hooking up, casual sex, university students, female university students, religion, Catholicism, conservative Protestants, church attendance, sexual behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review