The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists.
Abstract
Repeatability (more precisely the common measure of repeatability, the intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC) is an important index for quantifying the accuracy of measurements and the constancy of phenotypes. It is the proportion of phenotypic variation that can be attributed to between-subject (or between-group) variation. As a consequence, the non-repeatable fraction of phenotypic variation is the sum of measurement error and phenotypic flexibility. There are several ways to estimate repeatability for Gaussian data, but there are no formal agreements on how repeatability should be calculated for non-Gaussian data (e.g. binary, proportion and count data). In addition to point estimates, appropriate uncertainty estimates (standard errors and confidence intervals) and statistical significance for repeatability estimates are required regardless of the types of data. We review the methods for calculating repeatability and the associated statistics for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data. For Gaussian data, we present three common approaches for estimating repeatability: correlation-based, analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based and linear mixed-effects model (LMM)-based methods, while for non-Gaussian data, we focus on generalised linear mixed-effects models (GLMM) that allow the estimation of repeatability on the original and on the underlying latent scale. We also address a number of methods for calculating standard errors, confidence intervals and statistical significance; the most accurate and recommended methods are parametric bootstrapping, randomisation tests and Bayesian approaches. We advocate the use of LMM- and GLMM-based approaches mainly because of the ease with which confounding variables can be controlled for. Furthermore, we compare two types of repeatability (ordinary repeatability and extrapolated repeatability) in relation to narrow-sense heritability. This review serves as a collection of guidelines and recommendations for biologists to calculate repeatability and heritability from both Gaussian and non-Gaussian data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The survey was based on the validated International Hospital Outcomes Study questionnaire. 25”
From Nurses’ Shift Length and Overtime Working in 12 European Countries: The Association With Perceived Quality of Care and Patient Safety (2014) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002) · Statisctics and computing/Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · Cited by 25,941
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1969) · Cited by 20,963
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · Cited by 8,910
Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30 · Cited by 6,903
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
(2002) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00356.x · Cited by 6,176
MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package
Hadfield, J. D. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i02 · Cited by 4,900
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Becker W. A.(1992).A manual of quantitative genetics 5th edition. Academic Enterprises Pullman WA.
- Faraway J. J., 2006, Extending the linear model
- Snijders T. A. B., 1999, Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 901–1,000 of 1,003
Repeatable Territorial Aggression in a Neotropical Poison Frog
Chaloupka, S., Peignier, M., Stückler, S., Araya‐Ajoy, Y. G., Walsh, P. T., Ringler, M., & Ringler, E. (2022) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2022.881387 · Cited by 22
Snake personality: Differential effects of development and social experience
Skinner, M., Brown, S., Kumpan, L. T., & Miller, N. Y. (2022) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-022-03227-0 · Cited by 22
“In addition to providing repeatability estimates, the rptR function provides estimates of among-individual and within-individual variance (Nakagawa and Schielzeth 2010).”
BackgroundRollins, R. E., Sato, K., Nakao, M., Tawfeeq, M. T., Herrera‐Mesías, F., Pereira, R. J., Kovalev, S. Y., Margos, G., Fingerle, V., Kawabata, H., et al. (2022) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.16805 · Cited by 22
“Residual error was calculated according to Nakagawa and Schielzeth (2010).”
MethodThe repeatability of mating failure in a polyandrous bug
Greenway, E. V., & Shuker, D. M. (2015) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12678 · Cited by 24
Watts, J. C., Ross, C., & Jones, T. C. (2015) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.12.020 · Cited by 22
Repeatability in the contact calling system of Spix's disc-winged bat (Thyroptera tricolor)
Chaverri, G., & Gillam, E. H. (2015) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.140197 · Cited by 21
Dumont, F., Lucas, É., & Réale, D. J. F. (2016) · BioControl · doi:10.1007/s10526-016-9721-8 · Cited by 22
Baylis, A. M. M., Orben, R. A., da Costa, D. P., Arnould, J., & Staniland, I. J. (2016) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps11759 · Cited by 22
Female fecundity traits in wild populations of African annual fish: the role of the aridity gradient
Vrtílek, M., & Reichard, M. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2337 · Cited by 22
Flexibility but no coordination of visits in provisioning riflemen
Khwaja, N., Preston, S. A. J., Hatchwell, B. J., Briskie, J. V., Winney, I. S., & Savage, J. L. (2017) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.12.021 · Cited by 22
Dumont, F., Lucas, É., & Réale, D. J. F. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176369 · Cited by 22
Antioxidant allocation modulates sperm quality across changing social environments
Mora, A. R., Meniri, M., Gning, O., Glauser, G., Vallat, A., & Helfenstein, F. (2017) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0176385 · Cited by 22
Morinay, J., Forsman, J. T., Kivelä, S. M., Gustafsson, L., & Doligez, B. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00167 · Cited by 22
Behavioral thermoregulation is highly repeatable and unaffected by digestive status in Agama atra
van Berkel, J., & Clusella‐Trullas, S. (2018) · Integrative Zoology · doi:10.1111/1749-4877.12325 · Cited by 22
McHuron, E. A., Hazen, E. L., & da Costa, D. P. (2018) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-018-3382-3 · Cited by 22
Yetsko, K., Ross, M., Bellantuono, A. J., Merselis, D. G., Rodríguez‐Lanetty, M., & Gilg, M. R. (2020) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps13407 · Cited by 23
“Bootstrap samples were simulated from a Gaussian distribution, whose parameters are estimated based on the real sample (Nakagawa & Schielzeth 2010, Stoffel et al. 2017) (R code is in - cluded in the Supplement [Code S1]).”
MethodSequential organization of birdsong: relationships with individual quality and fitness
Zsebők, S., Herczeg, G., Laczi, M., Nagy, G., Vaskúti, É., Hargitai, R., Hegyi, G., Herényi, M., Markó, G., Rosivall, B., et al. (2020) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/araa104 · Cited by 22
Katsis, A. C., Buchanan, K. L., Kleindorfer, S., & Mariette, M. M. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-020-02939-5 · Cited by 22
“To estimate adjusted R for each behavioral measure, we used the “reduced” LMMs described above, which included treatment and other significant fixed effects in the model to control for potential confounding variables (Nakagawa and Schielzeth 2010).”
MethodRepeatability and heritability of social reaction norms in a wild agamid lizard
Strickland, K., Mitchell, D. J., Delmé, C., & Frère, C. (2021) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.14298 · Cited by 22
“Repeatability was estimated using variance parameters estimated on the latent scale (Nakagawa and Schielzeth 2010), and was calculated as follows: Rint = VIDint VIDint + VID∗yearint Rslope = VIDslope VIDslope + VID∗yearslope where VID is among-individual variance and VID∗year is the…”
MethodBolund, E., Schielzeth, H., & Forstmeier, W. (2012) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-012-1346-z · Cited by 22
Homberger, B., Jenni‐Eiermann, S., & Jenni, L. (2014) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2014.09.020 · Cited by 22
Lack of experience-based stratification in homing pigeon leadership hierarchies
Watts, I., Pettit, B., Nagy, M., de Perera, T. B., & Biro, D. (2016) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.150518 · Cited by 22
Montoya, B., Valverde, M., Rojas, E., & Torres, R. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.141325 · Cited by 22
Bonnet‐Lebrun, A., Phillips, R. A., Manica, A., & Rodrigues, A. S. L. (2018) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-018-3408-x · Cited by 22
Microplastics promote the invasiveness of invasive alien species under fluctuating water regime
Zhang, R., Guo, Y., Lai, Y., Zhao, T., Li, G., Yan, Z., Wang, Y., & Rillig, M. C. (2024) · Journal of Applied Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2664.14726 · Cited by 23
Johnson, G. C., Karajah, M. T., Mayo, K., Armenta, T. C., & Blumstein, D. T. (2016) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12401 · Cited by 21
A comparison study on modeling of clustered and overdispersed count data for multiple comparisons
Kruppa, J., & Hothorn, L. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1080/02664763.2020.1788518 · Cited by 21
“The appearance of count data is very common in many different fields of science: applied ecology [31], pharmacology [29], toxicology [10], and genetic biology [25].”
BackgroundHiggott, C. G., Evans, K. L., & Hatchwell, B. J. (2020) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2020.542179 · Cited by 21
Messmer, D. J., Alisauskas, R. T., Pöysä, H., Runko, P., & Clark, R. G. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-84160-6 · Cited by 23
Bentz, A. B., Niederhuth, C. E., Carruth, L. L., & Navara, K. J. (2021) · BMC Genomics · doi:10.1186/s12864-021-07466-9 · Cited by 18
“We calculated repeatability using a poisson model for count data [51], while controlling for variation introduced by the treatment with the package rptR [52] in R (version 3.”
MethodFamiliarity, dominance, sex and season shape common waxbill social networks
Gomes, A. C. R., Beltrão, P., Boogert, N. J., & Cardoso, G. C. (2022) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arac021 · Cited by 20
Gervais, L., Morellet, N., David, I., Hewison, M. A. J., Réale, D. J. F., Michel, G., Chaval, Y., Lourtet, B., Cargnelutti, B., Merlet, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13677 · Cited by 21
Inter-individual differences in laboratory rats as revealed by three behavioural tasks
Rudolfová, V., Petrásek, T., Antošová, E., Frynta, D., Landová, E., Valeš, K., & Nekovářová, T. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-13288-w · Cited by 21
Affordable RFID loggers for monitoring animal movement, activity, and behaviour
Harrison, N. D., & Kelly, E. L. (2022) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0276388 · Cited by 21
“Within individual repeatability of latency to approach and foraging effort was calculated using a linear mixed model repeatability estimate with a restricted maximum likelihood function in the program R [27] using the package rptR [28].”
MethodHandling stress does not reflect personality in female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
David, M., Auclair, Y., Dechaume‐Moncharmont, F., & Cézilly, F. (2011) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0024636 · Cited by 21
Smith, C. C., Harris, R. M., Lampert, K. P., Schartl, M., Hofmann, H. A., & Ryan, M. J. (2014) · Environmental Biology of Fishes · doi:10.1007/s10641-014-0234-y · Cited by 21
Dehnhard, N., & Hennicke, J. C. (2013) · Australian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1071/zo12123 · Cited by 21
Parental effects on early development: testing for indirect benefits of polyandry
Johnson, S. L., & Brockmann, H. J. (2013) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/art056 · Cited by 21
Houde, A. L. S., & Pitcher, T. E. (2016) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.1943 · Cited by 21
Montiglio, P., & DiRienzo, N. (2016) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arw094 · Cited by 21
Falica, B. K., Lehnert, S. J., Pitcher, T. E., Heath, D. D., & Higgs, D. M. (2016) · Aquaculture · doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2016.10.003 · Cited by 21
Growth Performance of Nestling CuckoosCuculus canorusin Cavity Nesting Hosts
Grim, T., & Samaš, P. (2016) · Acta Ornithologica · doi:10.3161/00016454ao2016.51.2.004 · Cited by 21
Habitat use and spatial fidelity of male South American sea lions during the nonbreeding period
Baylis, A. M. M., Orben, R. A., da Costa, D. P., Tierney, M., Brickle, P., & Staniland, I. J. (2017) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.2972 · Cited by 21
Does exploratory behavior or activity in a wild mouse explain susceptibility to virus infection?
Broecke, B. V., Borremans, B., Mariën, J., Makundi, R. H., Massawe, A. W., Leirs, H., & Hughes, N. K. (2017) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/cz/zox053 · Cited by 21
Wong, M. Y. L., Beasley, A. L., Douglass, T., Whalan, S., & Scott, A. (2017) · Coral Reefs · doi:10.1007/s00338-017-1625-2 · Cited by 21
Vellnow, N., Marie‐Orleach, L., Zadesenets, K. S., & Schärer, L. (2017) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.13212 · Cited by 21
Do small municipalities imitate larger ones? Diffusion of water privatization policies
Ruiz‐Villaverde, A., Chica‐Olmo, J., & González‐Gómez, F. (2017) · Urban Water Journal · doi:10.1080/1573062x.2017.1414860 · Cited by 21
Brain size predicts behavioural plasticity in guppies ( Poecilia reticulata ): An experiment
Herczeg, G., Urszán, T. J., Orf, S., Nagy, G., Kotrschal, A., & Kolm, N. (2018) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.13405 · Cited by 21
Liotta, M. N., Abbott, J. K., Ríos-Cárdenas, O., & Morris, M. R. (2019) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1093/biolinnean/blz053 · Cited by 21
Harvest selection on multiple traits in the wild revealed by aquatic animal telemetry
Moland, E., Carlson, S. M., Villegas‐Ríos, D., Wiig, J. R., & Olsen, E. M. (2019) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.5224 · Cited by 21
Assessing the use of rivers as migratory corridors for temperate bats
Cortes, K. M., & Gillam, E. H. (2019) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyz211 · Cited by 21
Seasonal niche tracking of climate emerges at the population level in a migratory bird
Fandós, G., Rotics, S., Sapir, N., Fiedler, W., Kaatz, M., Wikelski, M. C., Nathan, R., & Zurell, D. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.1799 · Cited by 21
“Confidence intervals around repeatability values were calculated following [38].”
BackgroundMethodHarrington, N. E., Sweeney, E., Alav, I., Allen, F., Moat, J., & Harrison, F. (2021) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/62187 · Cited by 21
“Micropersonality” traits and their implications for behavioral and movement ecology research
Bailey, J. D., King, A. J., Codling, E. A., Short, A. M., Johns, G. I., & Fürtbauer, I. (2021) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7275 · Cited by 21
“…2010; Roche et al., 2016) by fitting a univariate linear mixed model for each parameter using the lme4 package in R (Bates et al., 2015) with only the fish identity (ID) as a random factor (Dingemanse & Dochtermann, 2013; Houslay & Wilson, 2017; Nakagawa & Schielzeth, 2010; Roche et al., 2016).”
MethodPost‐weaning parental care increases fitness but is not heritable in North American red squirrels
Lane, J. E., McAdam, A. G., Charmantier, A., Humphries, M. M., Coltman, D. W., Fletcher, Q. E., Gorrell, J. C., & Boutin, S. A. (2015) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.12633 · Cited by 21
The effect of colour‐producing mechanisms on plumage sexual dichromatism in passerines and parrots
Delhey, K. J. V., & Peters, A. (2016) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12796 · Cited by 21
Unconventional gas development facilitates plant invasions
Barlow, K. M., Mortensen, D. A., Drohan, P. J., & Averill, K. M. (2017) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.07.005 · Cited by 21
The Effects of Perceived Mating Opportunities on Patterns of Reproductive Investment by Male Guppies
Barrett, L. T., Evans, J. P., & Gasparini, C. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0093780 · Cited by 20
Stuber, E. F., Baumgartner, C., Dingemanse, N. J., Kempenaers, B., & Mueller, J. C. (2016) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1534/g3.115.024216 · Cited by 21
Maskrey, D. K., White, S. J., Wilson, A. J., & Houslay, T. M. (2018) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.04.023 · Cited by 20
Personality and social foraging tactic use in free-living Eurasian tree sparrows (Passer montanus)
Fülöp, A., Németh, Z., Kocsis, B., Deák-Molnár, B., Bozsoky, T., & Barta, Z. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arz026 · Cited by 20
Winter corticosterone and body condition predict breeding investment in a nonmigratory bird
Montreuil-Spencer, C., Schoenemann, K. L., Lendvai, Á. Z., & Bonier, F. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arz129 · Cited by 20
An experimental test of changed personality in butterflies from anthropogenic landscapes
Kaiser, A., Merckx, T., & Dyck, H. V. (2020) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-020-02871-8 · Cited by 20
“Repeatability is the fraction of the total phenotypic variance that can be attributed to between-individual differences (Nakagawa and Schielzeth 2010).”
BackgroundMethodProximate Causes of Infertility and Embryo Mortality in Captive Zebra Finches
Pei, Y., Forstmeier, W., Wang, D., Martin, K., Rutkowska, J., & Kempenaers, B. (2020) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/710956 · Cited by 20
Measuring personality traits in Eurasian red squirrels: A critical comparison of different methods
Santicchia, F., Dongen, S. V., Martinoli, A., Preatoni, D. G., & Wauters, L. A. (2020) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/eth.13117 · Cited by 20
Insect morphometry is reproducible under average investigation standards
Csősz, S., Seifert, B., Mikó, I., Boudinot, B. E., Borowiec, M. L., Fisher, B. L., Prebus, M., Puniamoorthy, J., RAKOTONIRINA, J. C., Rasoamanana, N., et al. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.7075 · Cited by 19
Birnie‐Gauvin, K., Koed, A., & Aarestrup, K. (2021) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.13917 · Cited by 20
Ammous, F., Zhao, W., Lin, L., Ratliff, S. M., Mosley, T. H., Bielak, L. F., Zhou, X., Peyser, P. A., Kardia, S. L. R., & Smith, J. A. (2022) · Clinical Epigenetics · doi:10.1186/s13148-022-01229-3 · Cited by 21
“Parametric bootstrapping (1000 iterations) was used to calculate the 95% confidence intervals of the ICC coefficients [52, 53].”
MethodJackson, J., Lawson, C., Adelmant, C., Huhtala, E., Fernandes, P., Hodgson, R., King, H., Williamson, L., Maseyk, K., Hawes, N., et al. (2022) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.9623 · Cited by 20
Merz, M. R., Boone, S. R., & Mortelliti, A. (2023) · Ecosphere · doi:10.1002/ecs2.4377 · Cited by 20
Brekke, P., Ewen, J. G., Clucas, G. V., & Santure, A. W. (2015) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12287 · Cited by 20
Honza, M., Procházka, P., & Požgayová, M. (2012) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1600-048x.2011.05392.x · Cited by 20
Nestling activity levels during begging behaviour predicts activity level and body mass in adulthood
McCowan, L. S. C., & Griffith, S. C. (2014) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.566 · Cited by 20
Miller, R., Laskowski, K. L., Schiestl, M., Bugnyar, T., & Schwäb, C. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0148822 · Cited by 22
Predator experience homogenizes consistent individual differences in predator avoidance
Sommer‐Trembo, C., Zimmer, C., Jourdan, J., Bierbach, D., & Plath, M. W. (2016) · Journal of Ethology · doi:10.1007/s10164-016-0460-1 · Cited by 20
Greggor, A. L., Spencer, K. A., Clayton, N. S., & Thornton, A. (2016) · General and Comparative Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.ygcen.2016.11.006 · Cited by 20
An experimental test of state–behaviour feedbacks: gizzard mass and foraging behaviour in red knots
Mathot, K. J., Dekinga, A., & Piersma, T. (2017) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12827 · Cited by 20
Oppel, S., Weber, S., Weber, N. L., Fox, D., Leat, E. H. K., Sim, J., Sommerfeld, J., Bolton, M., Broderick, A. C., & Godley, B. J. (2017) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps12377 · Cited by 20
Eckel, B. A., Guo, R., & Reinhardt, K. (2017) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2017.00165 · Cited by 21
Fire‐disturbed landscapes induce phenotypic plasticity in lizard locomotor performance
Wild, K. H., & Gienger, C. M. (2018) · Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1111/jzo.12545 · Cited by 20
Social cues affect quantitative genetic variation and covariation in animal personality traits
Rudin, F. S., Simmons, L. W., & Tomkins, J. L. (2018) · Evolution · doi:10.1111/evo.13661 · Cited by 19
Plasticity, state-dependency, and individual consistency in Canada goose nest defense behavior
Clermont, J., Réale, D. J. F., Lindsay, M.-È., & Giroux, J. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-019-2681-0 · Cited by 20
Nachev, V., & Winter, Y. (2019) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-019-2637-4 · Cited by 20
Morinay, J., Daniel, G., Gustafsson, L., & Doligez, B. (2019) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.05.001 · Cited by 20
Effects of trap confinement on personality measurements in two terrestrial rodents
Brehm, A. M., Tironi, S., & Mortelliti, A. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0221136 · Cited by 20
Adaptation potential of the copepod Eurytemora affinis to a future warmer Baltic Sea
Karlsson, K., & Winder, M. (2020) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.6267 · Cited by 20
“The heritability of a full sibling design can also be calculated within the framework of an ANOVA, see for example, Avery (2005) or Nakagawa and Schielzeth (2010) for calculations.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialAn Innovative Setup for High-Throughput Respirometry of Small Aquatic Animals
Drown, M. K., DeLiberto, A. N., Crawford, D. L., & Oleksiak, M. F. (2020) · Frontiers in Marine Science · doi:10.3389/fmars.2020.581104 · Cited by 20
Ezenwa, V. O., Budischak, S. A., Buss, P. E., Seguel, M., Luikart, G., Jolles, A. E., & Sakamoto, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2015080118 · Cited by 22
Álvarez‐Quintero, N., Velando, A., & Kim, S. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arab052 · Cited by 19
Pintor, L. M., McGhee, K. E., Roche, D. P., & Bell, A. M. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-014-1779-7 · Cited by 20
Ensminger, A. L., & Fernández‐Juricic, E. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0111854 · Cited by 20
Dry conditions disrupt terrestrial–aquatic linkages in northern catchments
Emilson, E. J. S., Kielstra, B. W., Arnott, S. E., Watmough, S. A., Gunn, J. M., & Tanentzap, A. J. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13361 · Cited by 20
Rapid divergence of animal personality and syndrome structure across an arid-aquatic habitat matrix
Moran, N. P., Mossop, K. D., Thompson, R. M., Chapple, D. G., & Wong, B. B. M. (2017) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-017-3924-2 · Cited by 20
Madlon‐Kay, S., Montague, M. J., Brent, L. J. N., Ellis, S., Zhong, B. L., Snyder‐Mackler, N., Horvath, J. E., Skene, J. H. P., & Platt, M. L. (2018) · American Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1002/ajp.22873 · Cited by 21
Muntifering, J. R., Linklater, W. L., Naidoo, R., !Uri‐≠Khob, S., du Preez, P., Beytell, P. C., Jacobs, S. M., & Knight, A. T. (2018) · Animal Conservation · doi:10.1111/acv.12454 · Cited by 20
Hermit crabs as model species for investigating the behavioural responses to pollution
Briffa, M., Arnott, G., & Hardege, J. D. (2023) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.167360 · Cited by 20
Dieker, P., Beckmann, L., Teckentrup, J., & Schielzeth, H. (2018) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.4156 · Cited by 19
Plasticity and repeatability of activity patterns in free-living Arctic ground squirrels
Chmura, H. E., Zhang, V. Y., Wilbur, S. M., Barnes, B. M., Buck, C. L., & Williams, C. T. (2020) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.09.007 · Cited by 19
“…body of literature assessing statistical approaches for calculating repeatability (Dingemanse & Dochtermann, 2013; Mitchell et al., 2019; Nakagawa & Schielzeth, 2010; Wolak, Fairbairn, & Paulsen, 2012), we think it bears mentioning that repeatability estimates are inherently sensitive to sampling…”
BackgroundMethodWood warblers learn to recognize mobbing calls of an unfamiliar species from heterospecific tutors
Szymkowiak, J. (2020) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.11.004 · Cited by 19
Golobinek, R., Gregorič, M., & Kralj‐Fišer, S. (2021) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology10030189 · Cited by 19
“We calculated repeatability as r = Vind Vind+Ve [38].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nakagawa, Shinichi
- Schielzeth, Holger
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-21
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 935-956
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2045443942
- Cited by
- 2,584
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 109 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 235 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 197 · 2018: 215 · 2017: 198 · 2016: 183 · 2015: 167 · 2014: 136 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 78
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient, non-Gaussian data, linear mixed models, measurement error, phenotypic flexibility, statistical significance, parametric bootstrapping, permutation tests, Bayesian approach, narrow-sense heritability, binary data, count data, proportion data
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Phenotype, Regression Analysis, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Confidence Intervals, Normal Distribution, Linear Models, Least-Squares Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review