The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Repeatability for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data: a practical guide for biologists.
Abstract
Repeatability (more precisely the common measure of repeatability, the intra-class correlation coefficient, ICC) is an important index for quantifying the accuracy of measurements and the constancy of phenotypes. It is the proportion of phenotypic variation that can be attributed to between-subject (or between-group) variation. As a consequence, the non-repeatable fraction of phenotypic variation is the sum of measurement error and phenotypic flexibility. There are several ways to estimate repeatability for Gaussian data, but there are no formal agreements on how repeatability should be calculated for non-Gaussian data (e.g. binary, proportion and count data). In addition to point estimates, appropriate uncertainty estimates (standard errors and confidence intervals) and statistical significance for repeatability estimates are required regardless of the types of data. We review the methods for calculating repeatability and the associated statistics for Gaussian and non-Gaussian data. For Gaussian data, we present three common approaches for estimating repeatability: correlation-based, analysis of variance (ANOVA)-based and linear mixed-effects model (LMM)-based methods, while for non-Gaussian data, we focus on generalised linear mixed-effects models (GLMM) that allow the estimation of repeatability on the original and on the underlying latent scale. We also address a number of methods for calculating standard errors, confidence intervals and statistical significance; the most accurate and recommended methods are parametric bootstrapping, randomisation tests and Bayesian approaches. We advocate the use of LMM- and GLMM-based approaches mainly because of the ease with which confounding variables can be controlled for. Furthermore, we compare two types of repeatability (ordinary repeatability and extrapolated repeatability) in relation to narrow-sense heritability. This review serves as a collection of guidelines and recommendations for biologists to calculate repeatability and heritability from both Gaussian and non-Gaussian data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The survey was based on the validated International Hospital Outcomes Study questionnaire. 25”
From Nurses’ Shift Length and Overtime Working in 12 European Countries: The Association With Perceived Quality of Care and Patient Safety (2014) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing
R Core Team (2000) · doi:10.32614/r.manuals · Cited by 355,893
Modern Applied Statistics with S
Venables, W. N., & Ripley, B. D. (2002) · Statisctics and computing/Statistics and computing · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21706-2 · Cited by 25,941
Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.
Shrout, P. E., & Fleiss, J. L. (1979) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420 · Cited by 24,532
Introduction to Quantitative Genetics.
Edwards, A. W. F., & Falconer, D. S. (1982) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529912 · Cited by 21,447
Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research
Sokal, R. R., & Rohlf, F. J. (1969) · Cited by 20,963
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Generalized linear mixed models: a practical guide for ecology and evolution
Bolker, B. M., Brooks, M. E., Clark, C. J., Geange, S. W., Poulsen, J. R., Stevens, M. H. H., & White, J.-S. S. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2008.10.008 · Cited by 8,910
Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients.
McGraw, K. O., & Wong, S. P. (1996) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.1.1.30 · Cited by 6,903
Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits
(2002) · Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics · doi:10.1046/j.1439-0388.2002.00356.x · Cited by 6,176
MCMC Methods for Multi-Response Generalized Linear Mixed Models: The MCMCglmm R Package
Hadfield, J. D. (2010) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v033.i02 · Cited by 4,900
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Becker W. A.(1992).A manual of quantitative genetics 5th edition. Academic Enterprises Pullman WA.
- Faraway J. J., 2006, Extending the linear model
- Snijders T. A. B., 1999, Multilevel analysis: an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–200 of 1,003
Laskowski, K. L., & Pruitt, J. N. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.3166 · Cited by 120
RetractedSpiegel, O., Leu, S. T., Sih, A., Godfrey, S. S., & Bull, C. M. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.1768 · Cited by 119
Do detour tasks provide accurate assays of inhibitory control?
van Horik, J. O., Langley, E., Whiteside, M., Laker, P. R., Beardsworth, C. E., & Madden, J. R. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2018.0150 · Cited by 120
What is an animal personality?
Kaiser, M. I., & Müller, C. (2021) · Biology & Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10539-020-09776-w · Cited by 118
“…(i.e., temporal stability) can be statistically tested, for example, by applying generalised linear mixed effect models and exploring the variance explained by an individual divided by the sum of variance explained by the individual and among individual variance (Nakagawa and Schielzeth 2010).”
BackgroundDingemanse, N. J., Barber, I., WRIGHT, J. M., & Brommer, J. E. (2012) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02439.x · Cited by 117
Laskowski, K. L., & Bell, A. M. (2014) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.02.010 · Cited by 114
Abram, P. K., Jacques Brodeur, B., Burte, V., & Boivin, G. (2016) · Biological Control · doi:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2016.04.002 · Cited by 114
Mazza, V., Eccard, J. A., Zaccaroni, M., Jacob, J., & Dammhahn, M. (2018) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.01.011 · Cited by 123
Chillón, P., Hales, D. P., Vaughn, A., Gizlice, Z., Ni, A., & Ward, D. S. (2014) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-11-61 · Cited by 113
Poeta, G., Conti, L., Malavasi, M., Battisti, C., & Acosta, A. T. R. (2016) · Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science · doi:10.1016/j.ecss.2016.08.041 · Cited by 113
Experimental evidence for adaptive personalities in a wild passerine bird
Nicolaus, M., Tinbergen, J. M., Bouwman, K. M., Michler, S. P. M., Ubels, R., Both, C., Kempenaers, B., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2012.1936 · Cited by 110
Maternal exposure to predator scents: offspring phenotypic adjustment and dispersal
Bestion, E., Teyssier, A., Aubret, F., Clobert, J., & Côté, J. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0701 · Cited by 109
Shaw, R. C. (2016) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2016.06.004 · Cited by 109
Jolles, J. W., Briggs, H. D., Araya‐Ajoy, Y. G., & Boogert, N. J. (2019) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.06.022 · Cited by 109
The details in the distributions: why and how to study phenotypic variability
Geiler‐Samerotte, K., Bauer, C., Li, S., Ziv, N., Gresham, D., & Siegal, M. L. (2013) · Current Opinion in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2013.03.010 · Cited by 108
Nicolaus, M., Tinbergen, J. M., Ubels, R., Both, C., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2016) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12584 · Cited by 108
Zöttl, M., Vullioud, P., Mendonça, R., Torrents‐Ticó, M., Gaynor, D., Mitchell, A. E., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1607885113 · Cited by 107
Grecian, W. J., Lane, J. V., Michelot, T., Wade, H. M., & Hamer, K. C. (2018) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2018.0084 · Cited by 107
Fixed-effect variance and the estimation of repeatabilities and heritabilities: issues and solutions
de Villemereuil, P., Morrissey, M. B., Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H. (2017) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/jeb.13232 · Cited by 106
Interindividual variability in habitat use: evidence for a risk management syndrome in roe deer?
Bonnot, N. C., Verheyden, H., Blanchard, P., Côté, J., Debeffe, L., Cargnelutti, B., Klein, F., Hewison, A. J. M., & Morellet, N. (2014) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/aru169 · Cited by 104
Personality affects zebra finch feeding success in a producer–scrounger game
David, M., Cézilly, F., & Giraldeau, L. (2011) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.03.025 · Cited by 104
Personality predicts foraging site fidelity and trip repeatability in a marine predator
Harris, S. M., Descamps, S., Sneddon, L. U., Bertrand, P., Chastel, O., & Patrick, S. C. (2019) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.13106 · Cited by 104
Benetos, A., Toupance, S., Gautier, S., Labat, C., Kimura, M., Rossi, P. M., Settembre, N., Hubert, J., Frimat, L., Bertrand, B., et al. (2018) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.311751 · Cited by 103
Immunosenescence in wild animals: meta‐analysis and outlook
Peters, A., Delhey, K. J. V., Nakagawa, S., Aulsebrook, A. E., & Verhulst, S. (2019) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.13343 · Cited by 113
López‐López, P., García‐Ripollés, C., & Uríos, V. (2014) · Current Zoology · doi:10.1093/czoolo/60.5.642 · Cited by 102
Wilson, A. J., de Boer, M., Arnott, G., & Grimmer, A. J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028024 · Cited by 102
Ouwehand, J., Ahola, M., Ausems, A. N. M. A., Bridge, E. S., Burgess, M. D., Hahn, S., Hewson, C. M., Klaassen, R. H. G., Laaksonen, T., Lampe, H. M., et al. (2015) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.00721 · Cited by 101
Hunting regulation favors slow life histories in a large carnivore
de Walle, J. V., Pigeon, G., Zedrosser, A., Swenson, J. E., & Pelletier, F. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03506-3 · Cited by 101
Learning and personality types are related in cavies (Cavia aperea).
Guenther, A., Brust, V., Dersen, M., & Trillmich, F. (2013) · Journal of comparative psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033678 · Cited by 101
Vitousek, M. N., Jenkins, B. R., & Safran, R. J. (2014) · Hormones and Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2014.11.004 · Cited by 98
Charbonneau, D., & Dornhaus, A. (2015) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-015-1958-1 · Cited by 97
Edelaar, P., Serrano, D., Carrete, M., Blas, J., Potti, J., & Tella, J. L. (2012) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/ars006 · Cited by 103
Hormones and Fitness: Evidence for Trade-Offs in Glucocorticoid Regulation Across Contexts
Vitousek, M. N., Taff, C. C., Hallinger, K. K., Zimmer, C., & Winkler, D. W. (2018) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2018.00042 · Cited by 97
Seltmann, M. W., Öst, M., Jaatinen, K., Atkinson, S., Mashburn, K. L., & Hollmén, T. E. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.07.012 · Cited by 99
Betini, G. S., & Norris, D. R. (2011) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.10.018 · Cited by 98
Boldness towards novel objects predicts predator inspection in wild vervet monkeys
Blaszczyk, M. B. (2016) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.10.017 · Cited by 97
Individual sociability and choosiness between shoal types
Côté, J., Fogarty, S., & Sih, A. (2012) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.03.019 · Cited by 97
How to fight multiple enemies: target-specific chemical defences in an aposematic moth
Rojas, B., Burdfield‐Steel, E., Pakkanen, H. K., Suisto, K., Maczka, M., Schulz, S., & Mappes, J. (2017) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.1424 · Cited by 96
The ontogeny of personality in the wild guinea pig
Guenther, A., Finkemeier, M., & Trillmich, F. (2014) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.01.032 · Cited by 95
Extreme migration and the individual quality spectrum
Conklin, J. R., Senner, N. R., Battley, P. F., & Piersma, T. (2017) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.01316 · Cited by 95
Cooke, S. J., Birnie‐Gauvin, K., Lennox, R. J., Taylor, J. J., Rytwinski, T., Rummer, J. L., Franklin, C. E., Bennett, J., & Haddaway, N. (2017) · Conservation Physiology · doi:10.1093/conphys/cox043 · Cited by 101
How should we interpret estimates of individual repeatability?
Wilson, A. J. (2018) · Evolution Letters · doi:10.1002/evl3.40 · Cited by 94
Personalities influence spatial responses to environmental fluctuations in wild fish
Villegas‐Ríos, D., Réale, D. J. F., Freitas, C., Moland, E., & Olsen, E. M. (2018) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12872 · Cited by 94
Briffa, M., & Greenaway, J. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0021963 · Cited by 94
Can behaviour explain invasion success? A comparison between sympatric invasive and native lizards
Damas‐Moreira, I., Riley, J. L., Harris, D. J., & Whiting, M. J. (2019) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.008 · Cited by 97
Are extra‐pair males different from cuckolded males? A case study and a meta‐analytic examination
Hsu, Y., Schroeder, J., Winney, I. S., Burke, T. A., & Nakagawa, S. (2015) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.13124 · Cited by 91
Würz, Y., & Krüger, O. (2015) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-12-s1-s9 · Cited by 92
Quantitative genetic methods depending on the nature of the phenotypic trait
de Villemereuil, P. (2018) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.13571 · Cited by 93
Unifying individual differences in personality, predictability and plasticity: A practical guide
O’Dea, R. E., Noble, D. W. A., & Nakagawa, S. (2021) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.13755 · Cited by 90
“Notation for all equations are explained in Table 1 (note that the same principles can be applied to non-Gaussian data too; Nakagawa & Schielzeth, 2010).”
Pharmacological manipulations of judgement bias: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Neville, V., Nakagawa, S., Zidar, J., Paul, E. S., Lagisz, M., Melissa Bateson, B., Løvlie, H., & Mendl, M. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.11.008 · Cited by 95
Carravieri, A., Paco Bustamante, A., Churlaud, C., Fromant, A., & Cherel, Y. (2014) · Marine Biology · doi:10.1007/s00227-014-2394-x · Cited by 90
Necessity or capacity? Physiological state predicts problem-solving performance in house sparrows
Bókony, V., Lendvai, Á. Z., Vágási, C. I., Pătraș, L., Pap, P. L., Nemeth, J., Vincze, E., Papp, S., Preiszner, B., Seress, G., et al. (2013) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/art094 · Cited by 90
Ceia, F. R., Paiva, V. H., Fidalgo, V. A. C., Morais, L., Baeta, A. S. B. V., Crisóstomo, P., Mourato, E., Garthe, S., Marques, J. C., & Ramos, J. A. (2013) · Marine Ecology Progress Series · doi:10.3354/meps10586 · Cited by 90
You are what you eat: diet shapes body composition, personality and behavioural stability
Han, C. S., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2017) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/s12862-016-0852-4 · Cited by 95
Weiß, A., Staes, N., Pereboom, Z., Inoue‐Murayama, M., Stevens, J. M. G., & Eens, M. (2015) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797615589933 · Cited by 89
Laskowski, K. L., & Bell, A. M. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12105 · Cited by 89
Innovative problem solving in birds: a cross-species comparison of two highly successful passerines
Griffin, A. S., & Diquelou, M. C. (2014) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2014.11.012 · Cited by 88
Polverino, G., Cigliano, C., Nakayama, S., & Mehner, T. (2016) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-016-2206-z · Cited by 75
Spatial personalities: a meta-analysis of consistent individual differences in spatial behavior
Stuber, E. F., Carlson, B., & Jesmer, B. R. (2021) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arab147 · Cited by 91
Koskenpato, K., Ahola, K., Karstinen, T., & Karell, P. (2015) · Journal of Avian Biology · doi:10.1111/jav.00746 · Cited by 86
The dimensionality of individual niche variation
Ingram, T., Costa‐Pereira, R., & Araújo, M. S. (2017) · Ecology · doi:10.1002/ecy.2129 · Cited by 86
Carrete, M., & Tella, J. L. (2013) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03524 · Cited by 86
Repeated stressors in adulthood increase the rate of biological ageing
Hau, M., Haussmann, M. F., Greives, T. J., Matlack, C., Costantini, D., Quetting, M., Adelman, J. S., Miranda, A. C., & Partecke, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/s12983-015-0095-z · Cited by 85
Dominoni, D. M., & Partecke, J. (2015) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2014.0118 · Cited by 85
Differences in boldness are repeatable and heritable in a long‐lived marine predator
Patrick, S. C., Charmantier, A., & Weimerskirch, H. (2013) · Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1002/ece3.748 · Cited by 85
Rudin, F. S., & Briffa, M. (2011) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.2418 · Cited by 85
Spatial and Temporal Variability in Migration of a Soaring Raptor Across Three Continents
Phipps, W. L., López‐López, P., Buechley, E. R., Oppel, S., Álvarez, E., Arkumarev, V. S., Bekmansurov, R. H., Berger‐Tal, O., Bermejo, A., Bounas, A., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00323 · Cited by 84
Garamszegi, L. Z. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2_7 · Cited by 84
Evangelista, C., Boiché, A., Lecerf, A., & Cucherousset, J. (2014) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12208 · Cited by 84
Clegg, I. L. K., Rödel, H. G., & Delfour, F. (2017) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2017.01.026 · Cited by 90
Meta-analytic evidence that animals rarely avoid inbreeding
de Boer, R. A., Vega‐Trejo, R., Kotrschal, A., & Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01453-9 · Cited by 87
Measurement artefacts lead to false positives in the study of birdsong in noise
Brumm, H., Zollinger, S. A., Niemelä, P. T., & Sprau, P. (2017) · Methods in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12766 · Cited by 81
Early Environmental Conditions Shape Personality Types in a Jumping Spider
Liedtke, J., Redekop, D., Schneider, J. M., & Schuett, W. (2015) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2015.00134 · Cited by 82
Foraging distribution of a tropical seabird supports Ashmole’s hypothesis of population regulation
Oppel, S., Beard, A., Fox, D. S., Mackley, E. K., Leat, E. H. K., Henry, L., Clingham, E., Fowler, N. H., Sim, J., Sommerfeld, J., et al. (2015) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-015-1903-3 · Cited by 87
Fisher, D. N., James, A., Rodríguez‐Muñoz, R., & Tregenza, T. (2015) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2015.0708 · Cited by 82
Heritable variation in host tolerance and resistance inferred from a wild host–parasite system
Mazé‐Guilmo, E., Loot, G., Páez, D. J., Léfèvre, T., & Blanchet, S. (2014) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2013.2567 · Cited by 81
Testing for between individual correlations of personality and physiological traits in a wild bird
Kluen, E., Siitari, H., & Brommer, J. E. (2013) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-013-1635-1 · Cited by 81
Pauli, B. D., Wiech, M., Heino, M., & Utne-Palm, A. C. (2015) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/jfb.12620 · Cited by 81
Haste Makes Waste but Condition Matters: Molt Rate–Feather Quality Trade-Off in a Sedentary Songbird
Vágási, C. I., Pap, P. L., Vincze, O., Benkő, Z., Marton, A., & Barta, Z. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040651 · Cited by 85
Monceau, K., Maher, N., Bonnard, O., & Thiéry, D. (2012) · Apidologie · doi:10.1007/s13592-012-0172-7 · Cited by 81
Mathot, K. J., van den Hout, P. J., Piersma, T., Kempenaers, B., Réale, D. J. F., & Dingemanse, N. J. (2011) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2011.01698.x · Cited by 81
Fast and behavior-selective exploitation of a marine fish targeted by anglers
Alós, J., Palmer, M., Rosselló, R., & Arlinghaus, R. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep38093 · Cited by 82
Of city and village mice: behavioural adjustments of striped field mice to urban environments
Dammhahn, M., Mazza, V., Schirmer, A., Göttsche, C., & Eccard, J. A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69998-6 · Cited by 80
Ross, J. G. B., Newman, C., Buesching, C. D., Connolly, E. M., Nakagawa, S., & Macdonald, D. W. (2021) · Climate Change Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.ecochg.2021.100022 · Cited by 90
Brent, L. J. N., Semple, S., MacLarnon, A. M., Ruiz-Lambides, A. V., González‐Martínez, J., & Platt, M. L. (2013) · International Journal of Primatology · doi:10.1007/s10764-013-9724-6 · Cited by 81
Rodríguez‐Quilón, I., del Blanco, L. S., Serra‐Varela, M. J., Koskela, J., González‐Martínez, S. C., & Alı́a, R. (2016) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1002/eap.1361 · Cited by 80
Mazza, V., Dammhahn, M., Lösche, E., & Eccard, J. A. (2020) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.15304 · Cited by 79
“We tested whether individual behavioural responses were repeatable, that is, consistent across contexts, using the rtpR package and adjusting for testing environment (field vs. laboratory; Nakagawa & Schielzeth, 2010; Stoffel, Nakagawa, Schielzeth, & Goslee, 2017).”
MethodEarly-life environmental enrichment generates persistent individualized behavior in mice
Zocher, S., Schilling, S., Grzyb, A. N., Adusumilli, V. S., Lopes, J. B., Günther, S., Overall, R. W., Winter, Y., & Kempermann, G. (2020) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abb1478 · Cited by 86
Consistent individual differences in cooperative behaviour in meerkats (Suricata suricatta)
English, S., Nakagawa, S., & Clutton-Brock, T. H. (2010) · Journal of Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2010.02025.x · Cited by 79
Recent social conditions affect boldness repeatability in individual sticklebacks
Jolles, J. W., Taylor, B. A., & Manica, A. (2015) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.12.010 · Cited by 79
Laubu, C., Dechaume‐Moncharmont, F., Motreuil, S., & Schweitzer, C. (2016) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1501013 · Cited by 79
Boldness predicts an individual's position along an exploration–exploitation foraging trade‐off
Patrick, S. C., Pinaud, D., & Weimerskirch, H. (2017) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12724 · Cited by 79
David, M., Auclair, Y., & Cézilly, F. (2012) · Ethology · doi:10.1111/j.1439-0310.2012.02085.x · Cited by 78
Multinomial analysis of behavior: statistical methods
Koster, J., & McElreath, R. L. (2017) · Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1007/s00265-017-2363-8 · Cited by 80
Does metabolic rate predict risk‐taking behaviour? A field experiment in a wild passerine bird
Mathot, K. J., Nicolaus, M., Araya‐Ajoy, Y. G., Dingemanse, N. J., & Kempenaers, B. (2014) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2435.12318 · Cited by 78
Debecker, S., Sanmartín‐Villar, I., de Guinea, M., Cordero‐Rivera, A., & Stoks, R. (2016) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/1365-2656.12499 · Cited by 80
Evidence for dispersal syndromes in freshwater fishes
Comte, L., & Olden, J. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2017.2214 · Cited by 78
Reliability of the DIERS Formetric 4D Spine Shape Parameters in Adults without Postural Deformities
Degenhardt, B. F., Starks, Z., & Bhatia, S. (2020) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2020/1796247 · Cited by 77
“Parametric boot-strapping [22] was used to calculate the associated 95% confidence interval (CI) for each ICC.”
Clegg, I. L. K., Rödel, H. G., Boivin, X., & Delfour, F. (2018) · Applied Animal Behaviour Science · doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2018.01.015 · Cited by 83
Knoch, D., Abbadi, A., Grandke, F., Meyer, R. C., Samans, B., Werner, C. R., Snowdon, R. J., & Altmann, T. (2019) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13171 · Cited by 76
Metadata
- Authors
- Nakagawa, S., & Schielzeth, H.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Society (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Nakagawa, Shinichi
- Schielzeth, Holger
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-06-21
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 935-956
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2045443942
- Cited by
- 2,584
- References
- 85
- Citations by year
- 2026: 109 · 2025: 165 · 2024: 141 · 2023: 171 · 2022: 235 · 2021: 222 · 2020: 206 · 2019: 197 · 2018: 215 · 2017: 198 · 2016: 183 · 2015: 167 · 2014: 136 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 78
- FWCI
- 8.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Morphological variations and asymmetry
- Keywords
- repeatability, intraclass correlation coefficient, non-Gaussian data, linear mixed models, measurement error, phenotypic flexibility, statistical significance, parametric bootstrapping, permutation tests, Bayesian approach, narrow-sense heritability, binary data, count data, proportion data
- MeSH terms
- Analysis of Variance, Phenotype, Regression Analysis, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Confidence Intervals, Normal Distribution, Linear Models, Least-Squares Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review