The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives
Open accessAbstract
Ecophylogenetics can be viewed as an emerging fusion of ecology, biogeography and macroevolution. This new and fast‐growing field is promoting the incorporation of evolution and historical contingencies into the ecological research agenda through the widespread use of phylogenetic data. Including phylogeny into ecological thinking represents an opportunity for biologists from different fields to collaborate and has provided promising avenues of research in both theoretical and empirical ecology, towards a better understanding of the assembly of communities, the functioning of ecosystems and their responses to environmental changes. The time is ripe to assess critically the extent to which the integration of phylogeny into these different fields of ecology has delivered on its promise. Here we review how phylogenetic information has been used to identify better the key components of species interactions with their biotic and abiotic environments, to determine the relationships between diversity and ecosystem functioning and ultimately to establish good management practices to protect overall biodiversity in the face of global change. We evaluate the relevance of information provided by phylogenies to ecologists, highlighting current potential weaknesses and needs for future developments. We suggest that despite the strong progress that has been made, a consistent unified framework is still missing to link local ecological dynamics to macroevolution. This is a necessary step in order to interpret observed phylogenetic patterns in a wider ecological context. Beyond the fundamental question of how evolutionary history contributes to shape communities, ecophylogenetics will help ecology to become a better integrative and predictive science.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Phylogenies and the Comparative Method
Felsenstein, J. (1985) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/284325 · Cited by 9,793
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974
Lavorel, S., & Garnier, E. (2002) · Functional Ecology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00664.x · Cited by 3,452
Productivity and sustainability influenced by biodiversity in grassland ecosystems.
Tilman, D., Wedin, D., & Knops, J. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/379718a0 · Cited by 2,803
The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology
Cavender‐Bares, J., Kozak, K. H., Fine, P. V. A., & Kembel, S. W. (2009) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01314.x · Cited by 2,321
A leaf-height-seed (LHS) plant ecology strategy scheme
Westoby, M. (1998) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1023/a:1004327224729 · Cited by 1,925 · cited 2×
“leaf-heightseed scheme (LHS); (Westoby, 1998)], and some studies have attempted to validate such traits as relevant to characterize species niches descriptors (e.”
BackgroundOriginal Articles: Ecological Resilience, Biodiversity, and Scale
Peterson, G., Allen, C. R., & Holling, C. S. (1998) · Ecosystems · doi:10.1007/s100219900002 · Cited by 1,547
Biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality
Hector, A., & Bagchi, R. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05947 · Cited by 1,412 · cited 1×
“The choice of functional traits is critical to BEF studies, and especially for the investigation of the multifunctionality of ecosystems (Hector & Bagchi, 2007; Zavaleta et al., 2010).”
BackgroundFunctional and phylogenetic diversity as predictors of biodiversity–ecosystem-function relationships
Flynn, D. F. B., Mirotchnick, N., Jain, M., Palmer, M. I., & Naeem, S. (2011) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/10-1245.1 · Cited by 890 · cited 1×
“They concluded that phylogenetically diverse communities capture important functional diversity not reflected in the functional traits usually used in this kind of experiment (see also Flynn et al., 2011).”
BackgroundEvolutionary history and the effect of biodiversity on plant productivity
Cadotte, M. W., Cardinale, B. J., & Oakley, T. H. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0805962105 · Cited by 653
Cited by
Ecophylogenetics Clarifies the Evolutionary Association between Mammals and Their Gut Microbiota
Gaulke, C. A., Arnold, H. K., Humphreys, I. R., Kembel, S. W., O’Dwyer, J. P., & Sharpton, T. J. (2018) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.01348-18 · Cited by 117
Impacts of taxonomic inertia for the conservation ofAfrican ungulate diversity: an overview
Gippoliti, S., Cotterill, F. P. D., Zinner, D., & Groves, C. P. (2018) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12335 · Cited by 63
A Guided Tour of Phylogenetic Comparative Methods for Studying Trait Evolution
Cornwallis, C. K., & Griffin, A. S. (2024) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102221-050754 · Cited by 37
Metadata
- Authors
- Mouquet, N., Devictor, V., Meynard, C. N., Munoz, F., Bersier, L., Chave, J., Couteron, P., Dalecky, A., Fontaine, C., Gravel, D., Hardy, O. J., Jabot, F., Lavergne, S., Leibold, M., Mouillot, D., Münkemüller, T., Pavoine, S., Prinzing, A., Rodrigues, A. S. L., Rohr, R. P., Thébault, E., & Thuiller, W.
- Venue
- Biological Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-03-20
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 769-785
- ISSN
- 0006-3231 (ISSN-L)
- 1464-7931
- 1469-185X
- OpenAlex
- W2063898287
- Cited by
- 452
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 2.98
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00224.x
- The paper
- Mouquet, N., Devictor, V., Meynard, C. N., Munoz, F., Bersier, L., Chave, J., Couteron, P., Dalecky, A., Fontaine, C., Gravel, D., Hardy, O. J., Jabot, F., Lavergne, S., Leibold, M., Mouillot, D., Münkemüller, T., Pavoine, S., Prinzing, A., Rodrigues, A. S. L., . . . Thuiller, W. (2012). Ecophylogenetics: advances and perspectives. Biological Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-185x.2012.00224.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.