Cited by 37Evolution and Paleontology StudiesMorphological variations and asymmetryAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

A Guided Tour of Phylogenetic Comparative Methods for Studying Trait Evolution

Open access
Cornwallis, Charlie K., Griffin, Ashleigh S.·2024·Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics

Abstract

Phylogenetic comparative methods are important tools in biology, providing insights into the way traits evolve. There are many technical resources describing how these methods work. Our aim here is to complement these with an overview of the types of biological questions that can be addressed by different methods and to outline potential pitfalls and considerations when embarking on comparative studies. First, we introduce what comparative methods are and why they are important. Second, we outline how they can be used to understand when, where, and how frequently traits evolve. Third, we examine how the coevolution of traits within and between species can be studied, along with patterns of causality. Finally, we discuss how to approach comparative analyses and the ways in which different types of data, such as published relationships, omic, and remote sensing data, can be integrated.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102221-050754

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Phylogenetic methods can be used to also address other questions, such as how features of the genome influence diversification.

    “Of note, phylogenetic methods can be used to also address other questions, such as how features of the genome influence diversification41–43.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

  • More recently developed methods allow analyses to go further and test competing causal hypotheses.

    “More recently developed methods allow analyses to go further and test competing causal hypotheses42,84.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

  • Testing whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link.

    “To distinguish which scenario is more likely, we could test whether an ancestral change in one trait consistently leads to the same change in the other trait, which would suggest the co-evolution is due to a causal link42,43,51,85–87 (Fig. 3).”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

  • Controlling for phylogeny can reduce the chance of detecting a significant result that is not real (Type II error or 'false positive').

    “Instead, controlling for phylogeny can reduce the chance of detecting a significant result that is not real (Type II error or ‘false positive’)18,42.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

  • Correlational results from observational data do not prove causation, but correlations can be used within comparative analyses to test causal hypotheses and examine evidence for causality.

    “A general point here is that correlational results from observational data do not prove causation, but correlations can be used within comparative analyses to test causal hypotheses and examine evidence for causality42,90.”

    From A phylogenetic approach to comparative genomics (2025) · cites this paper as [42]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornwallis, C. K., & Griffin, A. S.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics
Published
2024-11-04
Volume
55
Issue
1
Pages
181-204
ISSN
  • 1543-592X (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-2069
OpenAlex
W4401406493
Cited by
37
References
107
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Morphological variations and asymmetry
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
phylogenetic comparative analysis, character evolution, coevolution, evolutionary rates, phylogenetic signal, multi-omics integration, remote sensing data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review