The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Prevalence of Specific Arithmetic Difficulties and Specific Reading Difficulties in 9‐ to 10‐year‐old Boys and Girls
Abstract
Abstract Data from an epidemiological sample ( n = 1206) of British schoolchildren were used to estimate the proportions of 9‐ to 10‐year‐olds with specific arithmetic difficulties (SAD), combined with arithmetic‐and‐reading difficulties (ARD), and specific reading difficulties (SRD). Children in the sample contributed scores on saparate tests of arithmetic reading and nonverbal intelligence. Using a cutting‐store approach, which took into account performance on all three tests, a small group of children with SAD (1.3 %) were distinguished from tarter groups with ARD (2.3%) and SRD (3.9%). Contrary to some previous reports, there were equal numbers of males and females within each of the two groups with arithmetic difficulties but a preponderance of males over females amongst the group with specific reading difficulties.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Development of Working Memory in Normally Achieving and Subtypes of Learning Disabled Children
Siegel, L. S., & Ryan, E. B. (1989) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1131037 · Cited by 842
OVER‐ AND UNDER‐ACHIEVEMENT IN READING: DISTRIBUTION IN THE GENERAL POPULATION
YULE, W., RUTTER, M., BERGER, M., & THOMPSON, J. (1974) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1974.tb00760.x · Cited by 154
THE IDENTIFICATION AND PREVALENCE OF SPECIFIC READING RETARDATION
RODGERS, B. (1983) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02570.x · Cited by 134
Cited by
Developmental dyscalculia and basic numerical capacities: a study of 8–9-year-old students
Landerl, K., Bevan, A., & Butterworth, B. (2004) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2003.11.004 · Cited by 907
Comorbidity of learning disorders: prevalence and familial transmission
Landerl, K., & Moll, K. (2010) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02164.x · Cited by 435
Dyslexia and dyscalculia: two learning disorders with different cognitive profiles
Landerl, K., Fussenegger, B., Moll, K., & Willburger, E. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.006 · Cited by 409
Specific Learning Disorder: Prevalence and Gender Differences
Moll, K., Kunze, S., Neuhoff, N., Bruder, J., & Schulte-Körne, G. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0103537 · Cited by 378
Young, A. R., Beitchman, J. H., Johnson, C., Douglas, L., Atkinson, L., Escobar, M., & Wilson, B. (2002) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00052 · Cited by 362
Working memory deficit in children with mathematical difficulties: A general or specific deficit?
Andersson, U., & Lyxell, B. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2006.10.001 · Cited by 274
Working memory deficits in children with specific learning disorders
Schuchardt, K., Maehler, C., & Hasselhorn, M. (2008) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219408317856 · Cited by 254
Moll, K., Göbel, S. M., Gooch, D., Landerl, K., & Snowling, M. J. (2016) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219414547221 · Cited by 208
Tannock, R., Martinussen, R., & Frijters, J. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1005192220001 · Cited by 198
Andersson, U. (2010) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0016838 · Cited by 191
Quinn, J. M., & Wagner, R. K. (2015) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/0022219413508323 · Cited by 172
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Bryant, J. D., Hamlett, C. L., & Seethaler, P. M. (2007) · Exceptional Children · doi:10.1177/001440290707300303 · Cited by 163
Dyscalculia and dyslexia in adults: cognitive bases of comorbidity
Wilson, A. J., Andrewes, S. G., Struthers, H., Rowe, V. M., Bogdanovic, R., & Waldie, K. E. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.017 · Cited by 144
Moll, K., Göbel, S. M., & Snowling, M. J. (2015) · Child Neuropsychology · doi:10.1080/09297049.2014.899570 · Cited by 120
Epidemiology of reading disability: A comparison of DSM-5 and ICD-11 criteria
Di Folco, C., Guez, A., Peyre, H., & Ramus, F. (2022) · Scientific Studies of Reading · doi:10.1080/10888438.2021.1998067 · Cited by 64
Mental additions and verbal-domain interference in children with developmental dyscalculia
Mammarella, I. C., Caviola, S., Cornoldi, C., & Lucangeli, D. (2013) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.05.044 · Cited by 35
Educational interventions for children's learning difficulties
Hulme, C., & Melby‐Lervåg, M. (2015) · Rutter's Child and Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/9781118381953.ch41 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Lewis, C., Hitch, G. J., & Walker, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1994-02
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 283-292
- ISSN
- 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7610
- OpenAlex
- W2012275588
- Cited by
- 364
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 3.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
