Cited by 54Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentInjury Epidemiology and PreventionCrime Patterns and Interventions

Psychopathology, temperament and unintentional injury: cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships

Rowe, Richard, Simonoff, Emily, Silberg, Judy L.·2007·Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Growing evidence indicates a link between unintentional injury and both disruptive and emotional psychopathology. We present further evidence of these associations and address the underlying mechanisms. We also examine the genetic contribution to unintentional injury. METHODS: The Virginia Twin Study of Adolescent Behavioral Development provides genetically informative multi-wave and multi-informant data regarding common psychopathology using the Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Assessment interview. The EASI temperament scales and child injury involvement were measured in parent-report questionnaires. RESULTS: Unintentional injury showed significant genetic effects in girls and significant shared environmental effects in boys and girls. Symptoms of over-anxious disorder (OAD), and the EASI temperament scales were independently associated with injury. Longitudinal modeling showed impulsivity and OAD symptoms were related prospectively to injury involvement. Injuries did not increase risk for later impulsivity or OAD symptoms but were related prospectively to separation anxiety disorder symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Impulsivity and OAD symptoms increased risk of later injury. We discuss the processes that may be involved in these relationships.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2006.01674.x

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rowe, R., Simonoff, E., & Silberg, J. L.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Rowe, Richard
Venue
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-09-07
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
71-79
ISSN
  • 0021-9630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-7610
OpenAlex
W1991036410
Cited by
54
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (MH45268, R01MH045268)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Injury Epidemiology and Prevention
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime Patterns and Interventions
Keywords
unintentional injuries, child psychopathology, temperament, impulsivity, separation anxiety disorder, genetic factors, shared environment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety Disorders, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Phenotype, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Temperament, Twins, Wounds and Injuries, Prevalence, Attention Deficit and Disruptive Behavior Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review