The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Actions of opioids on excitatory and inhibitory transmission in substantia gelatinosa of adult rat spinal cord
Open accessAbstract
1. The actions of opioid receptor agonists on synaptic transmission in substantia gelatinosa (SG) neurones in adult (6- to 10-week-old) rat spinal cord slices were examined by use of the blind whole-cell patch-clamp technique. 2. Both the mu-receptor agonist DAMGO (1 microM) and the delta-receptor agonist DPDPE (1 microM) reduced the amplitude of glutamatergic excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) which were monosynaptically evoked by stimulating Adelta afferent fibres. Both also decreased the frequency of miniature EPSCs without affecting their amplitude. 3. In contrast, the kappa-receptor agonist U-69593 (1 microM) had little effect on the evoked and miniature EPSCs. 4. The effects of DAMGO and DPDPE were not seen in the presence of the mu-receptor antagonist CTAP (1 microM) and the delta-receptor antagonist naltrindole (1 microM), respectively. 5. Neither DAMGO nor DPDPE at 1 microM affected the responses of SG neurones to bath-applied AMPA (10 microM). 6. Evoked and miniature inhibitory postsynaptic currents (IPSCs), mediated by either the GABAA or the glycine receptor, were unaffected by the mu-, delta- and kappa-receptor agonists. Similar results were also obtained in SG neurones in young adult (3- to 4-week-old) rat spinal cord slices. 7. These results indicate that opioids suppress excitatory but not inhibitory synaptic transmission, possibly through the activation of mu- and delta- but not kappa-receptors in adult rat spinal cord SG neurones; these actions are presynaptic in origin. Such an action of opioids may be a possible mechanism for the antinociception produced by their intrathecal administration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Williams, J. T., Christie, M. J., & Manzoni, O. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.299 · Cited by 848
Manzanares, J., Julian, M., & Carrascosa, A. (2006) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/157015906778019527 · Cited by 287
Analgesic Effect of Acetaminophen: A Review of Known and Novel Mechanisms of Action
Ohashi, N., & Kohno, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2020.580289 · Cited by 223
Self-citationRole of the mu-opioid receptor in opioid modulation of immune function
Ninković, J., & Roy, S. (2013) · Amino Acids · doi:10.1007/s00726-011-1163-0 · Cited by 196
Gene Delivery Using Herpes Simplex Virus Vectors
Burton, E. A., Fink, D. J., & Glorioso, J. C. (2002) · DNA and Cell Biology · doi:10.1089/104454902762053864 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Kohno, T., Kumamoto, E., Higashi, H., Shimoji, K., & Yoshimura, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Physiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 518
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 803-813
- ISSN
- 0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7793
- OpenAlex
- W2143387733
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Actions of opioids on excitatory and inhibitory transmission in substantia gelatinosa of adult rat spinal cord. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0803p.x
- The paper
- Kohno, T., Kumamoto, E., Higashi, H., Shimoji, K., & Yoshimura, M. (1999). Actions of opioids on excitatory and inhibitory transmission in substantia gelatinosa of adult rat spinal cord. The Journal of Physiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0803p.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.