The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy
Abstract
Home range, habitat use, activity and movement patterns were studied in a pack of wolves in a mountainous region of Abruzzo, central Italy from June 1986 to March 1987. The home range, estimated by the minimum convex polygon from 421 radio locations, measured 197 km 2 and comprised several infrastructures and areas of human presence, including four garbage dumps and two offal sites. Core areas, calculated by the harmonic mean method, were located toward the centre of the home range where human disturbance and road density were lowest but forest cover was highest. During the time‐span of the study, home‐range use and movement patterns suggested a marked centrality in spatial behaviour and traditionality in retreat areas year‐round, both during pup‐rearing season and the following months. In addition, by being essentially nocturnal, resident wolves appeared to adopt tactics of temporal segregation from people to exploit food resources safely in the proximity of human settlements. Overall activity correlated with distance travelled (r = 0.90,P<< 0.001), and corresponded to cyclic nocturnal movements from retreat to feeding areas. Wolf movement rate between 20:00 and 04:00 h averaged 2.5 km/h but varied up to about 8 km/h, and daily distance travelled (x̄= 27 km/night; range 17–38 km/night) mostly depended on the location of traditional feeding sites. Home‐range configuration, habitat use, activity and movements all appeared highly integrated so as to represent the most functional compromise between avoidance of human inteference and exploitation of the available food resources.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Observational study of behavior: sampling methods
Altmann, J. (1974) · Behaviour · doi:10.1163/156853974x00534 · Cited by 13,891
Cited by
Assessment Of Prey Vulnerability Through Analysis Of Wolf Movements And Kill Sites
Bergman, E. J., Garrott, R. A., Creel, S., Borkowski, J. J., Jaffe, R., & Watson, F. G. R. (2006) · Ecological Applications · doi:10.1890/04-1532 · Cited by 142
Dirofilaria immitis in wolves recolonizing northern Italy: Are wolves competent hosts?
Moroni, B., Rossi, L., Meneguz, P. G., Orusa, R., Zoppi, S., Robetto, S., Marucco, F., & Tizzani, P. (2020) · Parasites & Vectors · doi:10.1186/s13071-020-04353-2 · Cited by 41
Novaro, A. J., Funes, M. C., & Jiménez, J. E. (2004) · The Biology and Conservation of Wild Canids · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198515562.003.0015 · Cited by 14
Martin, H. W., Mech, L. D., Fieberg, J., Metz, M. C., MacNulty, D. R., Stahler, D. R., & Smith, D. W. (2018) · Canadian Journal of Zoology · doi:10.1139/cjz-2017-0220 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Ciucci, P., Boitani, L., Francisci, F., & Andreoli, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Zoology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1997-12
- Volume
- 243
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 803-819
- ISSN
- 0952-8369 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-7998
- OpenAlex
- W1996145832
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb01977.x
- The paper
- Ciucci, P., Boitani, L., Francisci, F., & Andreoli, G. (1997). Home range, activity and movements of a wolf pack in central Italy. Journal of Zoology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1997.tb01977.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.