Cited by 41Parasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and controlResearch on Leishmaniasis Studies

Dirofilaria immitis in wolves recolonizing northern Italy: Are wolves competent hosts?

Open access
Moroni, Barbara, Rossi, Luca, Meneguz, Pier Giuseppe, Orusa, Riccardo, Zoppi, Simona, Robetto, Serena, Marucco, Francesca, Tizzani, Paolo·2020·Parasites & Vectors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Wild carnivores such as the grey wolf (Canis lupus), red fox (Vulpes vulpes) and golden jackal (Canis aureus) are recognized hosts of Dirofilaria immitis. However, few studies have focused on their actual role in the epidemiology of heartworm infection. This study describes the prevalence and distribution of D. immitis in wolves in a heartworm-endemic area in northern Italy where wolves have recently returned after long-time eradication, and investigates the fertility status of the collected adult nematodes. METHODS: In the frame of a long-term wolf monitoring programme in northwestern Italy, 210 wolf carcasses from four provinces were inspected for the presence of filarioid nematodes in the right heart and pulmonary arteries. Female heartworms were measured, and their uterine content analyzed according to a previously described "embryogram" technique. RESULTS: Three wolves, all originating from a single province (Alessandria), were positive for D. immitis (1.42%, 95% CI: 0.48-4.11%, in the whole study area; 13.6%, 95% CI: 4.7-33.3%, limited to the single province from which infected wolves originated). Mean intensity was 5 worms (range: 3-7) and the female worms measured 21-28 cm in length. Six out of 9 female worms harbored uterine microfilariae: 5 were classified as gravid; 1 showed a "discontinuous gradient"; and 3 were non-gravid. CONCLUSIONS: The present data show that heartworm infection is already prevalent in wolves that have recolonized the known heartworm-endemic area. Based on "embryogram" results, wolves were shown suitable heartworm hosts. Interestingly, investigated wolves appeared similarly exposed to heartworm infection as sympatric unprotected dogs (owned dogs that have never received any heartworm prevention treatment) sampled at the beginning of the wolf return process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13071-020-04353-2

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Italy, prevalence observed in wolves was 13.6%, with three to five adult worms in most cases, and another study in northern Italy found heartworms in 1.42% of wolves studied.

    “In Italy, the prevalence observed in wolves was 13.6%, finding from three to five adult worms in most cases. Another study in northern Italy found heartworms in 1.42% of the wolves studied [143].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [19]Pascucci I Fico R D’Angelo AR Serini S Cammà C Prima segnalazione in Italia di filariosi cardiopolmonare nel lupo (Canis lupus) Vet Ital 2007 43 843 850 20422563
  2. [31]Lok JB, Knight DH, Ramadan EI. Effects of ivermectin on embryogenesis in Dirofilaria immitis: age structure and spatial distribution of intrauterine forms as a function of dosage and time posttreatment. In: Proceeding of the American heartworm symposium, Washington, D.C.; 1989. p. 85–94.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moroni, B., Rossi, L., Meneguz, P. G., Orusa, R., Zoppi, S., Robetto, S., Marucco, F., & Tizzani, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Turin (IT)
  • Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale del Piemonte Liguria e Valle d'Aosta (IT)
Corresponding author
Tizzani, Paolo
Venue
Parasites & Vectors
Published
2020-09-22
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
482-482
ISSN
1756-3305 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3088663255
Cited by
41
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 17
FWCI
0.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Parasites & Vectors (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
Keywords
Dirofilaria immitis, grey wolf, wolf, wolf recolonization, filarioid nematodes, wild carnivores, Northern Italy
MeSH terms
Animals, Animals, Wild, Dirofilaria immitis, Dirofilariasis, Female, Foxes, Italy, Male, Microfilariae, Wolves, Host Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review