The DOI matches its Crossref record.
AN ARCHITECTURAL APPROACH TO THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF PLANT ROOT SYSTEMS
Abstract
Summary: Although plants devote a large proportion of their resources to roots, we have a poor understanding of the constraints under which root systems function. Roots are much less variable morphologically than leaves and it is likely that root systems rather than individual roots are the focus of natural selection. In other words, architecture is more important than morphology. Existing classifications of root systems, based on the developmental model, have failed to provide much insight into their functioning and an alternative, topological model is outlined, in which the link is the basic unit of classification. Other components of the architecture of root systems, including link lengths, branching angles and diameters, are considered and the ecological implications of variation in each is discussed. Simulation models of transport and space exploration are discussed and it is shown that resource cost, transport efficiency and exploration efficiency cannot be simultaneously minimized and that optimum form may vary with the mobility of the resource. In general, a ‘herringbone’ structure seems to be the most efficient at exploration of space but the least transport‐efficient and the most expensive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Plant root growth, architecture and function
Hodge, A., Berta, G., Doussan, C., Merchan, F., & Crespi, M. (2009) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-009-9929-9 · Cited by 799
Guo, D., Xia, M., Wei, X., Chang, W., Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2008) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02573.x · Cited by 687
Freschet, G. T., Pagès, L., Iversen, C. M., Comas, L. H., Rewald, B., Roumet, C., Klimešová, J., Zadworny, M., Poorter, H., Postma, J. A., et al. (2021) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17572 · Cited by 668
Management of crop water under drought: a review
Bodner, G., Nakhforoosh, A., & Kaul, H.-P. (2015) · Agronomy for Sustainable Development · doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0283-4 · Cited by 629
Metadata
- Authors
- FITTER, A. H.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1987-05
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- s1
- Pages
- 61-77
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2167896138
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: AN ARCHITECTURAL APPROACH TO THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF PLANT ROOT SYSTEMS. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04683.x
- The paper
- FITTER, A. H. (1987). AN ARCHITECTURAL APPROACH TO THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF PLANT ROOT SYSTEMS. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1987.tb04683.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.