The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The plastic plant: root responses to heterogeneous supplies of nutrients
Abstract
Summary: When roots encounter a nutrient‐rich zone or patch they often proliferate within it. Roots experiencing nutrient‐rich patches can also enhance their physiological ion‐uptake capacities compared with roots of the same plant outside the patch zone. These plastic responses by the root system have been proposed as the major mechanism by which plants cope with the naturally occurring heterogeneous supplies of nutrients in soil. Various attempts to predict how contrasting species will respond to patches have been made based on specific root length (SRL), root demography and biomass allocation within the patch zone. No one criterion has proved definitive. Actually demonstrating that root proliferation is beneficial to the plant, especially in terms of nitrogen capture from patches, has also proved troublesome. Yet by growing plants under more realistic conditions, such as in interspecific plant competition, and with a complex organic patch, a direct benefit can be demonstrated. Thus, as highlighted in this review, the environmental context in which the root response is expressed is as important as the magnitude of the response itself. Contents I. Introduction 9 II. Morphological responses 10 III. Root demography 14 IV. Physiological plasticity 14 V. Root plasticity in patches in competition and symbiosis with microorganisms 16 VI. Influence of patch attributes 17 VII. Control of root proliferation 19 VIII. Conclusions 20 Acknowledgements 20 References 20
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes
Jackson, R. B., Canadell, J., Ehleringer, J. R., Mooney, H. A., Sala, O. E., & Schulze, E. D. (1996) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/bf00333714 · Cited by 3,071
Cited by
Identifying the characteristics of organic soil amendments that suppress soilborne plant diseases
Bonanomi, G., Antignani, V., Capodilupo, M., & Scala, F. (2010) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2009.10.012 · Cited by 504
Root Architecture Responses: In Search of Phosphate
Péret, B., Desnos, T., Jost, R., Kanno, S., Berkowitz, O., & Nussaume, L. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.244541 · Cited by 292
Biochar amendment increases maize root surface areas and branching: a shovelomics study in Zambia
Abiven, S., Hund, A., Martinsen, V., & Cornelissen, G. (2015) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-015-2533-2 · Cited by 198
Bessler, H., Temperton, V. M., Roscher, C., Buchmann, N., Schmid, B., Schulze, E.-D., Weisser, W. W., & Engels, C. (2009) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/08-0867.1 · Cited by 134
Plant phosphorus-use and -acquisition strategies in Amazonia
Reichert, T., Rammig, A., Fuchslueger, L., Lugli, L. F., Quesada, C. A., & Fleischer, K. (2022) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.17985 · Cited by 132
Metadata
- Authors
- Hodge, A.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-03
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-24
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2152895243
- Cited by
- 1,686
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.23
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.