Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,105

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ecological limits to plant phenotypic plasticity

Valladares, Fernando, Gianoli, Ernesto, Gómez, José M.·2007·New Phytologist

Abstract

ContentsSummary749I.Phenotypic plasticity: if so good, why so little?750II.Ecological constraints caused by abiotic factors751III.Ecological constraints caused by biotic factors753IV.Ecological costs: influence of plasticity on species interactions755V.Plasticity and global change757VI.Concluding remarks758Acknowledgements759References759

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02275.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,105

Metadata

Authors
Valladares, F., Gianoli, E., & Gómez, J. M.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-08
Volume
176
Issue
4
Pages
749-763
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W2134800114
Cited by
1,105
References
2
FWCI
25.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.