The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Languishing for many years in the shadow of plant inorganic nitrogen (N) nutrition research, studies of organic N uptake have attracted increased attention during the last decade. The capacity of plants to acquire organic N, demonstrated in laboratory and field settings, has thereby been well established. Even so, the ecological significance of organic N uptake for plant N nutrition is still a matter of discussion. Several lines of evidence suggest that plants growing in various ecosystems may access organic N species. Many soils display amino acid concentrations similar to, or higher than, those of inorganic N, mainly as a result of rapid hydrolysis of soil proteins. Transporters mediating amino acid uptake have been identified both in mycorrhizal fungi and in plant roots. Studies of endogenous metabolism of absorbed amino acids suggest that L‐ but not D‐enantiomers are efficiently utilized. Dual labelled amino acids supplied to soil have provided strong evidence for plant uptake of organic N in the field but have failed to provide information on the quantitative importance of this process. Thus, direct evidence that organic N contributes significantly to plant N nutrition is still lacking. Recent progress in our understanding of the mechanisms underlying plant organic N uptake may open new avenues for the exploration of this subject. ContentsSummary31I.Introduction31II.Availability32III.Uptake34IV.Field studies of plant amino acid uptake41V.Conclusions and future perspectives43Acknowledgements44References45
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Agricultural Intensification and Ecosystem Properties
Matson, P. A., Parton, W. J., Power, A. G., & Swift, M. J. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.277.5325.504 · Cited by 3,160
Nitrogen mineralization: Challenges of a changing paradigm
Schimel, J. P., & Bennett, J. (2004) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/03-8002 · Cited by 2,511
Cited by
Clarholm, M., Skyllberg, U., & Rosling, A. (2015) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2015.02.019 · Cited by 317
Mei, W., Sun, H., Song, M., Jiang, L., Li, Y., Lu, W., Ying, G.-G., Luo, C., & Zhang, G. (2021) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2021.106642 · Cited by 209
Sustainable life support on Mars – the potential roles of cyanobacteria
Verseux, C., Baqué, M., Lehto, K., de Vera, J.-P. P., Rothschild, L. J., & Billi, D. (2016) · International Journal of Astrobiology · doi:10.1017/s147355041500021x · Cited by 194
Zhang, L., Yang, X., Gao, D., Wang, L., Li, J., Wei, Z., & Shi, Y. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-06248-2 · Cited by 83
Metadata
- Authors
- Näsholm, T., Kielland, K., & Ganeteg, U.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-02-05
- Volume
- 182
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 31-48
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2142137445
- Cited by
- 1,184
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 63.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02751.x
- The paper
- Näsholm, T., Kielland, K., & Ganeteg, U. (2009). Uptake of organic nitrogen by plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02751.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.