The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Remote sensing detection of droughts in Amazonian forest canopies
Open accessAbstract
*Remote sensing data are a key tool to assess large forested areas, where limitations such as accessibility and lack of field measurements are prevalent. Here, we have analysed datasets from moderate resolution imaging spectroradiometer (MODIS) satellite measurements and field data to assess the impacts of the 2005 drought in Amazonia. *We combined vegetation indices (VI) and climatological variables to evaluate the spatiotemporal patterns associated with the 2005 drought, and explore the relationships between remotely-sensed indices and forest inventory data on tree mortality. *There were differences in results based on c4 and c5 MODIS products. C5 VI showed no spatial relationship with rainfall or aerosol optical depth; however, distinct regions responded significantly to the increased radiation in 2005. The increase in the Enhanced VI (EVI) during 2005 showed a significant positive relationship (P < 0.07) with the increase of tree mortality. By contrast, the normalized difference water index (NDWI) exhibited a significant negative relationship (P < 0.09) with tree mortality. *Previous studies have suggested that the increase in EVI during the 2005 drought was associated with a positive response of forest photosynthesis to changes in the radiation income. We discuss the evidence that this increase could be related to structural changes in the canopy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The drought of Amazonia in 2005.
Marengo, J. A., Nobre, C. A., Tomasella, J., Oyama, M. D., Sampaio de Oliveira, G., de Oliveira, R., Camargo, H., Alves, L. M., & Brown, I. F. (2008) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/2007jcli1600.1 · Cited by 725
Cited by
Time‐lag effects of global vegetation responses to climate change
Wu, D., Zhao, X., Liang, S., Zhou, T., Huang, K., Tang, B., & Zhao, W. (2015) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.12945 · Cited by 1,050
Hartmann, H., Bastos, A., Das, A. J., Esquivel-Muelbert, A., Hammond, W. M., Martínez-Vilalta, J., McDowell, N. G., Powers, J. S., Pugh, T. A. M., Ruthrof, K. X., et al. (2022) · Annual Review of Plant Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev-arplant-102820-012804 · Cited by 574
Global analysis of time-lag and -accumulation effects of climate on vegetation growth
Ding, Y., Li, Z., & Peng, S. (2020) · International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation · doi:10.1016/j.jag.2020.102179 · Cited by 269
Rhee, J., & Im, J. (2017) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.02.011 · Cited by 245
Vulnerability of Amazonian forests to repeated droughts
Anderson, L. O., Ribeiro Neto, G., Cunha, A. P., Fonseca, M. G., Mendes de Moura, Y., Dalagnol, R., Wagner, F. H., & de Aragão, L. E. O. E. C. (2018) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2017.0411 · Cited by 148
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, L. O., Malhi, Y., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Ladle, R., Arai, E., Barbier, N., & Phillips, O.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-07-19
- Volume
- 187
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 733-750
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W2140886475
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Remote sensing detection of droughts in Amazonian forest canopies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03355.x
- The paper
- Anderson, L. O., Malhi, Y., Aragão, L. E. O. C., Ladle, R., Arai, E., Barbier, N., & Phillips, O. (2010). Remote sensing detection of droughts in Amazonian forest canopies. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03355.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.