Cited by 239Fire effects on ecosystemsPlant Diversity and EvolutionPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils

Fire and the spread of flowering plants in the Cretaceous

Open access
Bond, William J., Scott, Andrew C.·2010·New Phytologist

Abstract

We suggest that the spread of angiosperms in the Cretaceous was facilitated by novel fire regimes. Angiosperms were capable of high productivity and therefore accumulated flammable biomass ('fuel') more rapidly than their predecessors. They were capable of rapid reproduction, allowing populations to spread despite frequent disturbance. We evaluate the evidence for physical conditions conducive to fires in the Cretaceous. These included high temperatures, seasonally dry climate and higher atmospheric oxygen than current levels. We evaluate novel properties of angiosperms that contributed to rapid biomass accumulation, and to their ability to thrive in frequently disturbed environments. We also review direct evidence for Cretaceous fires. Charcoal mesofossils are common in Cretaceous deposits of the Northern Hemisphere. Inertinite, the charcoal component of coal, is common throughout the Cretaceous and into the Palaeocene, but declined steeply from the Eocene when angiosperm-dominated forests became widespread. Direct and indirect evidence is consistent with angiosperms initiating novel fire regimes, promoting angiosperm spread in the Cretaceous. Several traits are consistent with frequent surface fires. We suggest that forest was slow to develop until the Eocene, when fire activity dropped to very low levels. The causes and consequences of fires in the deep past warrant greater attention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03418.x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fire contributed to the diversification and spread of angiosperms.

    “for example contributing to the diversification and spread of angiosperms (Bond & Scott, 2010)”

    From The human dimension of fire regimes on Earth (2011) · cites this paper as Bond & Scott, 2010

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bond, W. J., & Scott, A. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • Royal Holloway University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Bond, William J.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-09-02
Volume
188
Issue
4
Pages
1137-1150
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W1980011082
Cited by
239
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 24
FWCI
15.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New Phytologist (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Keywords
angiosperm radiation, Cretaceous, fire regimes, inertinite, atmospheric oxygen, surface fire, forest development, Eocene, paleofire
MeSH terms
Charcoal, Fires, Time Factors, Trees, Magnoliopsida, Biodiversity, History, Ancient

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review