The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Stoichiometric flexibility as a regulator of carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems under change
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Ecosystems across the biosphere are subject to rapid changes in elemental balance and climatic regimes. A major force structuring ecological responses to these perturbations lies in the stoichiometric flexibility of systems – the ability to adjust their elemental balance whilst maintaining function. The potential for stoichiometric flexibility underscores the utility of the application of a framework highlighting the constraints and consequences of elemental mass balance and energy cycling in biological systems to address global change phenomena. Improvement in the modeling of ecological responses to disturbance requires the consideration of the stoichiometric flexibility of systems within and across relevant scales. Although a multitude of global change studies over various spatial and temporal scales exist, the explicit consideration of the role played by stoichiometric flexibility in linking micro‐scale to macro‐scale biogeochemical processes in terrestrial ecosystems remains relatively unexplored. Focusing on terrestrial systems under change, we discuss the mechanisms by which stoichiometric flexibility might be expressed and connected from organisms to ecosystems. We suggest that the transition from the expression of stoichiometric flexibility within individuals to the community and ecosystem scales is a key mechanism regulating the extent to which environmental perturbation may alter ecosystem carbon and nutrient cycling dynamics.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
C:N:P stoichiometry in soil: is there a “Redfield ratio” for the microbial biomass?
Cleveland, C. C., & Liptzin, D. (2007) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-007-9132-0 · Cited by 2,365
The Global Carbon Cycle: A Test of Our Knowledge of Earth as a System
Falkowski, P., Scholes, R. J., Boyle, E., Canadell, J., Canfield, D., Elser, J., Gruber, N., Hibbard, K., Högberg, P., Linder, S., et al. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5490.291 · Cited by 2,177
Canadell, J. G., Le Quéré, C., Raupach, M. R., Field, C. B., Buitenhuis, E. T., Ciais, P., Conway, T. J., Gillett, N. P., Houghton, R. A., & Marland, G. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702737104 · Cited by 2,136 · cited 1×
“The rapid shift in the bioavailability of essential elements, coupled with increasing atmospheric CO2 and warming (Raupach et al., 2007), can alter the stoichiometric relationships of biological systems at multiple scales.”
BackgroundShrub expansion in tundra ecosystems: dynamics, impacts and research priorities
Myers-Smith, I. H., Forbes, B. C., Wilmking, M., Hallinger, M., Lantz, T., Blok, D., Tape, K. D., Macias-Fauria, M., Sass-Klaassen, U., Lévesque, E., et al. (2011) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/6/4/045509 · Cited by 1,485
Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling
Hobbie, S. E. (1992) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90126-v · Cited by 1,242
Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization
Mack, M. C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R., & Chapin, F. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02887 · Cited by 1,030
Ecological Lessons from Free-Air CO 2 Enrichment (FACE) Experiments
Norby, R. J., & Zak, D. R. (2011) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144647 · Cited by 681
Measuring and monitoring soil organic carbon stocks in agricultural lands for climate mitigation
Conant, R. T., Ogle, S. M., Paul, E. A., & Paustian, K. (2011) · Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment · doi:10.1890/090153 · Cited by 184
Cited by
Human-induced nitrogen–phosphorus imbalances alter natural and managed ecosystems across the globe
Peñuelas, J., Poulter, B., Sardans, J., Ciais, P., van der Velde, M., Bopp, L., Boucher, O., Godderis, Y., Hinsinger, P., Llusia, J., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3934 · Cited by 1,518
Carbon use efficiency of microbial communities: stoichiometry, methodology and modelling
Sinsabaugh, R. L., Manzoni, S., Moorhead, D. L., & Richter, A. (2013) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/ele.12113 · Cited by 991
Mooshammer, M., Wanek, W., Zechmeister-Boltenstern, S., & Richter, A. (2014) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00022 · Cited by 930
Li, Y., Niu, S., & Yu, G. (2016) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.13125 · Cited by 553
Elevation alters ecosystem properties across temperate treelines globally
Mayor, J. R., Sanders, N. J., Classen, A. T., Bardgett, R. D., Clément, J.-C., Fajardo, A., Lavorel, S., Sundqvist, M. K., Bahn, M., Chisholm, C., et al. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21027 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Sistla, S. A., & Schimel, J. P.
- Venue
- New Phytologist
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2012-07-27
- Volume
- 196
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-78
- ISSN
- 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8137
- OpenAlex
- W1748536088
- Cited by
- 336
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 25.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stoichiometric flexibility as a regulator of carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems under change. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04234.x
- The paper
- Sistla, S. A., & Schimel, J. P. (2012). Stoichiometric flexibility as a regulator of carbon and nutrient cycling in terrestrial ecosystems under change. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04234.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
