Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 391

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Low‐temperature perception leading to gene expression and cold tolerance in higher plants

Knight, Marc R., Knight, Heather·2012·New Phytologist

Abstract

Summary: Plant species exhibit a range of tolerances to low temperatures, and these constitute a major determinant of their geographical distribution and use as crops. When tolerance is insufficient, either chilling or freezing injuries result. A variety of mechanisms are employed to evade the ravages of extreme or sub‐optimal temperatures. Many of these involve cold‐responsive gene expression and require that the drop in temperature is first sensed by the plant. Despite intensive research over the last 100 yr or longer, we still cannot easily answer the question of how plants sense low temperature. Over recent years, genomic and post‐genomic approaches have produced a wealth of information relating to the sequence of events leading from cold perception to appropriate and useful responses. However, there are also crucial and significant gaps in the pathways constructed from these data. We describe the literature pertaining to the current understanding of cold perception, signalling and regulation of low‐temperature‐responsive gene expression in higher plants, raising some of the key questions that still intrigue plant biologists today and that could be targets for future work. Our review focuses on the control of gene expression in the pathways leading from cold perception to chilling and freezing tolerance. Contents Summary 737 I. Chilling and freezing: two different stresses requiring different solutions 738 II. Identification of a major cis‐element in the control of cold gene expression 739 III. The CBF transcription factors (TFs) and their regulation 739 IV. Events downstream of CBFs 740 V. A post‐genomic view on global transcript changes in response to low temperature 741 VI. The effect of light and circadian signals on cold gene expression 742 VII. Post‐transcriptional regulation 742 VIII. A receptor for cold? 742 IX. What are the characteristics of plant cell thermometer(s)? 744 X. Low‐temperature signalling downstream of perception 744 XI. Unresolved questions 747 Acknowledgements 748 References 748

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04239.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Cited by

See all 391

Metadata

Authors
Knight, M. R., & Knight, H.
Venue
New Phytologist
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-07-23
Volume
195
Issue
4
Pages
737-751
ISSN
  • 0028-646X (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8137
OpenAlex
W1774532335
Cited by
391
References
7
FWCI
18.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Low‐temperature perception leading to gene expression and cold tolerance in higher plants. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04239.x
The paper
Knight, M. R., & Knight, H. (2012). Low‐temperature perception leading to gene expression and cold tolerance in higher plants. New Phytologist. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2012.04239.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.