Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 403

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Emotional Imagery: Conceptual Structure and Pattern of Somato‐Visceral Response

Lang, Peter J., Kozak, Michael J., Miller, Gregory A., Levin, Daniel N., McLean, Alvin·1980·Psychophysiology

Abstract

This research examined deductions from a new theory of emotional imagery (Lang, 1979). Two experiments were performed, testing the hypothesis that the conceptual content processed during imagery determines the amplitude and pattern of coincident efferent activity. The image was manipulated by varying the content of the prompting instructions (either stimulus detail or active responding was emphasized in the image script) and by prior imagery training (in which subjects' post‐image verbal reports were shaped to emphasize either stimulus or response material). Three thematic contents were examined: neutral, action, and fear scenes. In Experiment I, a group which received response‐oriented imagery training and response scripts was compared to a stimulus‐oriented group. The results strongly supported the hypothesis: response subjects showed greater physiological activity during imagery, and their efferent pattern generally followed the script content. In Experiment II, one group again received response training and the other, stimulus training. However, half of each group was later tested on response‐structured scripts and the other half on stimulus scripts. Results again supported the hypothesis. As in Experiment I, response‐trained subjects tested on response scripts showed substantial physiological activity. None of the other groups, which received stimulus training and/or stimulus scripts, showed significant physiological responses during imagery. Response‐trained subjects generally rated their imagery as more vivid. Subjects administered response‐oriented scripts reported more emotional arousal than did subjects administered stimulus scripts.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00133.x

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 403

Metadata

Authors
Lang, P. J., Kozak, M. J., Miller, G. A., Levin, D. N., & McLean, A.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1980-03
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
179-192
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2057808550
Cited by
403
References
26
FWCI
5.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emotional Imagery: Conceptual Structure and Pattern of Somato‐Visceral Response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00133.x
The paper
Lang, P. J., Kozak, M. J., Miller, G. A., Levin, D. N., & McLean, A. (1980). Emotional Imagery: Conceptual Structure and Pattern of Somato‐Visceral Response. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1980.tb00133.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.