Cited by 90Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular and exercise physiologySport Psychology and Performance

Heart Rate Discrimination Before and After Exercise-Induced Augmented Cardiac Activity

Jones, Gary E., Hollandsworth, James G.·1981·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Although there is little direct evidence available, there is a pervasive assumption that HR is easily detected during periods of physical stress or exertion. It has also been suggested that distance runners are keenly aware of their cardiac functioning. The present study assessed cardiac awareness while at rest and again following vigorous exercise for groups of subjects differing in physical fitness. Thirty‐six subjects were solicited and composed groups of Sedentary, Tennis, and Distance Running groups. Each group was composed of equal numbers of male and female subjects. HR awareness was assessed using 35 10‐sec discrimination trials. Veridical feedback was composed of light flashes triggered by EKG R‐spikes whereas false feedback was composed of flashes at rates 10, 20, or 30 percent above or below their actual rate. At the end of each trial, subjects indicated the degree of certainty of their choice. Discrimination accuracy was measured at rest and again following exercise which raised HR level by 75 percent. Analyses of variance indicated that male runners were significantly more accurate discriminators at rest than any other group. Similar superiority was not shown by the female runners. After exercise, the tennis and sedentary groups showed significant overall increases in awareness during augmented cardiac functioning. Exercise did not produce additional increments in awareness for the male runners. A battery of post experimental questionnaires largely failed to disc…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03029.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cardiac perception accuracy increases following an increase in cardiac signal strength, such as that induced by isoproterenol infusions or exercise.

    “Indeed, cardiac perception accuracy has been found to increase following an increase in cardiac signal strength, for example that induced by isoproterenol infusions or exercise (Jones and Hollandsworth, 1981; Khalsa, Rudrauf, Sandesara, et al., 2009).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Jones and Hollandsworth, 1981

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, G. E., & Hollandsworth, J. G.
Affiliations
University of Southern Mississippi (US)
Corresponding author
Jones, Gary E.
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1981-05
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
252-257
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2059652702
Cited by
90
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Sport Psychology and Performance
Keywords
physical fitness, long-distance runners, tennis players, sedentary subjects, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Discrimination, Psychological, Physical Exertion, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Physical Fitness, Running, Tennis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review