Cited by 41Tactile and Sensory InteractionsHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMultisensory perception and integration

Sensitivity to mechanical stimuli and the role of general sensory and perceptual processes in heartbeat detection

Open access
KNAPP, KELLEY, RING, CHRISTOPHER, BRENER, JASPER·1997·Psychophysiology

Abstract

Sensitivity to heartbeat sensations is commonly assessed using tasks that require individuals to judge the simultaneity of heartbeats and tones. In two experiments, we investigated the suitability of this paradigm for examining cardioception. In the first experiment, participants judged the simultaneity of near-threshold vibrations and suprathreshold tones. Precision in judging vibration-tone simultaneity was directly related to the detectability of the mechanical stimuli, thereby supporting use of the simultaneity paradigm to assess heartbeat detection. In the second experiment, we examined the influences of sensitivity to mechanical stimuli and the ability to make intermodality simultaneity judgments on the precision of heartbeat detection. We measured participants' vibrotactile thresholds, precision in judging light-tone simultaneity, and precision in judging heartbeat-tone simultaneity. The ability to judge the simultaneity of lights and tones accounted for 24.3% of the variance in precision of heartbeat detection, and mechanical sensitivity accounted for a further 8.5%.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1997.tb02391.x

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A sizeable portion of variance in the heartbeat discrimination task appears to be accounted for by the ability to determine synchronicity of non-interoceptive cross-modal signals.

    “Further, although Ring and Brener (2018) argue that humans are able to judge very precisely (within 20 ms) whether two stimuli in different modalities are simultaneous (Zampini et al., 2005), a sizeable portion of variance in this task appears to be accounted for by the ability to determine synchronicity of (non-interoceptive) cross-modal signals (Knapp et al., 1997).”

    From Atypical interoception as a common risk factor for psychopathology: A review (2021) · cites this paper as Knapp et al., 1997

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Brener, J., & Ring. C. (1995). Sensory and perceptual factors in heartbeat detection. In D. Vaitl & R. Schandry (Eds.). From the heart to the brain: The psychophysiology of circulation-brain interaction. Frankfurt:Peter Lang.
  2. Kluvitse, C. (1987). Discrimination of cardiac activity. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hull, Hull, England.
  3. Stormer, S. W., Heilitag, U., & Knoll, J. F. (1989). Heartbeat perception and knowledge of results: A new method and some theoretical thoughts. Journal of Psychophysiology, 34, 340–350.
  4. Sinclair, D. (1967). Cutaneous sensation. London: Oxford University Press. StatSoft. (1993). Complete statistical system (CSS): Statistica. Tulsa, OK: Author.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
KNAPP, K., RING, C., & BRENER, J.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • University of Birmingham (GB)
Corresponding author
BRENER, JASPER
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1997-07
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
467-473
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W2054484911
Cited by
41
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Birmingham Research Portal (University of Birmingham) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01hl042366-06)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL 42366)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
Keywords
heartbeat detection, vibrotactile sensitivity, vibrotactile thresholds, perceptual processing
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Auditory Perception, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Light, Male, Physical Stimulation, Sensitivity and Specificity, Sensory Thresholds, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review