The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Effects of Task on the Modulation of Event‐Related Potentials by Word Repetition
Abstract
Event‐related potentials were recorded while subjects viewed 3 series of visually presented words. In each series some of the words were repetitions of an immediately preceding word. The subjects' task was to respond to occasional items (‘targets’), the nature of which was varied across the 3 series. Targets were either lower‐case words, non‐words, or animal names. When the targets were non‐words or animal names, event‐related potentials to repeated items were characterised by a large, C z‐maximum, positive‐going shift with an onset latency of around 300 ms. When the targets were lower‐case items, this repetition effect was greatly attenuated, due primarily to an increase in positivity in ERPs to unrepeated items. It is concluded firstly that the modulation of event‐related potentials by word repetition is task‐dependent. Secondly, the repetition effect seems better interpreted as an attenuation of an endogenous negativity present in ERPs to unrepeated items, than as a positive‐going component elicited by repeats.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels of processing: A framework for memory research
Craik, F. I. M., & Lockhart, R. S. (1972) · Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior · doi:10.1016/s0022-5371(72)80001-x · Cited by 9,566
Cited by
Mismatch Negativity: Different Water in the Same River
Picton, T. W., Alain, C., Otten, L., Ritter, W., & Achim, A. (2000) · Audiology and Neurotology · doi:10.1159/000013875 · Cited by 578
Event-related brain potentials dissociate repetition effects of high-and low-frequency words
Rugg, M. D. (1990) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03197126 · Cited by 494
Self-citationConvergence of biological and psychological perspectives on cognitive coordination in schizophrenia
Phillips, W. A., & Silverstein, S. M. (2003) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x03000025 · Cited by 445
Fractionating the Word Repetition Effect with Event-Related Potentials
Petten, C. V., Kutas, M., Kluender, R., Mitchiner, M., & McIsaac, H. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.2.131 · Cited by 391
Neurophysiological Manifestations of Recollective Experience during Recognition Memory Judgments
Smith, M. E. (1993) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1993.5.1.1 · Cited by 384
Metadata
- Authors
- Rugg, M. D., Furda, J., & Lorist, M.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1988-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-63
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2035792648
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.97
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effects of Task on the Modulation of Event‐Related Potentials by Word Repetition. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00958.x
- The paper
- Rugg, M. D., Furda, J., & Lorist, M. (1988). The Effects of Task on the Modulation of Event‐Related Potentials by Word Repetition. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1988.tb00958.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.