CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 113Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlTactile and Sensory InteractionsPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Signal-detection outcomes on heartbeat and respiratory resistance detection tasks in male and female subjects

HARVER, ANDREW, KATKIN, EDWARD S., BLOCH, ELISABETH·1993·Psychophysiology
DOI 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03347.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Male and female subjects were compared on heartbeat, respiratory resistance, and light-tone signal-detection tasks. Subjects judged whether a series of 10 tones was coincident with their heartbeats; whether an external load added to the airway was either present or absent during targeted inspiratory cycles; and whether a series of 10 light flashes was matched with auditory tones presented following a fixed delay of either 50 or 100 ms. Nonparametric indices of perceptual sensitivity and response bias indicated that men were more sensitive than women on the resistive load task (p < .05) and on the heartbeat task (p = .07). Performance on the light-tone task was virtually identical. All subjects used a stricter criterion on the respiratory resistance task than on either the heartbeat or the light-tone task; women employed a stricter criterion than men on the heartbeat task. The gender differences may be understood in terms of lateralization of central processing of somesthetic sensory information.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03347.x

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Brener J., 1974, Cardiovascular psycho‐physiology, 365
  2. Davis M. R., 1986, Psychophysiology, 76
  3. Guilford J. P., 1954, Psychometric methods
  4. Harver A., 1990, Dyspnea, 1
  5. Pengelly L. D., 1974, Loaded breathing
  6. Zechman V. W., 1986, Handbook of physiology: Sec. 3. The respiratory system, 449

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 113

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
HARVER, A., KATKIN, E. S., & BLOCH, E.
Affiliations
Stony Brook University (US)
Corresponding author
HARVER, ANDREW
ORCID
HARVER, ANDREW
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-05
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
223-230
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
DOI
10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb03347.x
OpenAlex
W1987568193
Cited by
113
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor, 5022 d)
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center for Research Resources (2S07RR0706723)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
signal detection theory, gender differences, heartbeat perception, respiratory resistance, auditory temporal processing, response bias, perceptual sensitivity, hemispheric lateralization, sex differences in perception
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Airway Resistance, Analysis of Variance, Discrimination, Psychological, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Task Performance and Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review