Cited by 187Neurobiology of Language and BilingualismAction Observation and SynchronizationHearing Impairment and Communication

Meaningful gestures: Electrophysiological indices of iconic gesture comprehension

Wu, Ying Choon, Coulson, Seana·2005·Psychophysiology

Abstract

To assess semantic processing of iconic gestures, EEG (29 scalp sites) was recorded as adults watched cartoon segments paired with soundless videos of congruous and incongruous gestures followed by probe words. Event-related potentials time-locked to the onset of gestures and probe words were measured in two experiments. In Experiment 1, participants judged the congruency between gestures and cartoons. Gestures elicited an N400-like component (gesture N450) that was larger for incongruent than congruent items, as well as a late positivity that was larger for congruent items. In Experiment 2, participants assessed the relatedness between probe words and preceding cartoon-gesture pairs. N450 effects to gestures were observed without overlapping positivity. These findings suggest that iconic gestures are subject to semantic processes analogous to those evoked by other meaningful representations, such as pictures and words.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00356.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The N450 is not only tied to cognitive conflict/action monitoring, but has also been associated with congruency processing during action observation and unexpected socially inappropriate actions.

    “Importantly, the N450 is not only tied to cognitive conflict/ action monitoring, but has also been associated with congruency processing during action observation (e.g., whether gestures and a given context match or not, Wu & Coulson, 2005), and unexpected socially inappropriate actions (Proverbio & Riva, 2009).”
  • More negative N450 amplitudes were reported for incongruent set-ups and unexpected actions.

    “More negative N450 amplitudes were reported for incongruent set-ups and unexpected actions (Proverbio & Riva, 2009;Wu & Coulson, 2005; see also Amoruso et al., 2013).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wu, Y. C., & Coulson, S.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Wu, Ying Choon
Venue
Psychophysiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-11
Volume
42
Issue
6
Pages
654-667
ISSN
  • 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
  • 1469-8986
OpenAlex
W1967429744
Cited by
187
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (n01mh002002-000)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH 2002-07)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Hearing Impairment and Communication
Keywords
iconic gestures, gesture comprehension, semantic processing, N450, event-related potentials, late positive potential, word meaning, visual word recognition
MeSH terms
Adult, Electroencephalography, Electrophysiology, Evoked Potentials, Female, Humans, Male, Nonverbal Communication, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review