The DOI matches its Crossref record; 78 of the 78 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An alternative scoring method for skin conductance responding in a differential fear conditioning paradigm with a long-duration conditioned stimulus
Open accessAbstract
Researchers examining skin conductance (SC) as a measure of aversive conditioning commonly separate the SC response into two components when the CS-UCS interval is sufficiently long. This convention drew from early theorists who described these components, the first- and second-interval responses, as measuring orienting and conditional responses, respectively. The present report critically examines this scoring method through a literature review and a secondary data analysis of a large-scale study of police and firefighter trainees that used a differential aversive conditioning procedure (n=287). The task included habituation, acquisition, and extinction phases, with colored circles as the CSs and shocks as the UCS. Results do not support the convention of separating the SC response into first- and second-interval responses. It is recommended that SC response scores be derived from data obtained across the entire CS-UCS interval.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, similar results for SCR have been observed when using different design choices (i.e., different interstimulus timing) (72) or preprocessing pipelines (e.g., scoring windows) (73).”
From I Doubt It Is Safe: A Meta-analysis of Self-reported Intolerance of Uncertainty and Threat Extinction Training (2021) · cites this paper as [73]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cognitive Therapy of Depression
HOLLON, S. D., & BECK, A. T. (1979) · Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-404480-7.50012-5 · Cited by 4,685
Publication Recommendations for Electrodermal Measurements
Fowles, D. C., Christie, M. J., Edelberg, R., Grings, W. W., Lykken, D. T., & Venables, P. H. (1981) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1981.tb03024.x · Cited by 1,700
Seligman, M. E. P. (1971) · Behavior Therapy · doi:10.1016/s0005-7894(71)80064-3 · Cited by 1,649
De novo conditioning in trauma-exposed individuals with and without posttraumatic stress disorder.
Orr, S. P., Metzger, L. J., Lasko, N. B., Macklin, M. L., Peri, T., & Pitman, R. K. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.109.2.290 · Cited by 653
Self-citationBrain circuits involved in emotional learning in antisocial behavior and social phobia in humans
Veit, R., Flor, H., Erb, M., Hermann, C., Lotze, M., Grodd, W., & Birbaumer, N. (2002) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/s0304-3940(02)00519-0 · Cited by 377
Context modulation of memory for fear extinction in humans
Milad, M. R., Orr, S. P., Pitman, R. K., & Rauch, S. L. (2005) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2005.00302.x · Cited by 297
Self-citationOhman, A., Fredrikson, M. G., Hugdahl, K., & Rimmö, P.-A. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037//0096-3445.105.4.313 · Cited by 290
Facial expressions as conditioned stimuli for electrodermal responses: A case of "preparedness"?
Öhman, A., & Dimberg, U. (1978) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.11.1251 · Cited by 243
Hugdahl, K., & Öhman, A. (1977) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Learning & Memory · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.3.5.608 · Cited by 241
Fear conditioning in panic disorder: Enhanced resistance to extinction
Michael, T., Blechert, J., Vriends, N., Margraf, J., & Wilhelm, F. H. (2007) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-843x.116.3.612 · Cited by 210
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Costa P. T., 1992, NEO‐PI‐R professional manual
- Derogatis L. R., 1983, SCL‐90‐R: Administration, scoring, and procedures manual‐II for the revised version
- Öhman A., 1973, Magnitude and habituation of the orienting reaction as predictors of discriminative electrodermal conditioning, Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 6, 293
- 10.1037/0096-3445.105.4.313 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-3514.38.2.278 · DOI
- Packer J. S., 1991, Conditioning with facial expression of emotion, Journal of Psychophysiology, 5, 79
- SAS Institute, Inc., 1989, SAS/STAT User's Guide
- Spielberger C. D., 1990, Manual for the State‐Trait Anxiety Inventory (self‐evaluation questionnaire)
- 10.1037/0022-3514.38.6.909 · DOI
- Vinogradova O. S., 1965, Orienting reflex and exploratory behavior, 45
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lonsdorf, T. B., Menz, M. M., Andreatta, M., Fullana, M. A., Golkar, A., Haaker, J., Heitland, I., Hermann, A., Kuhn, M., Kruse, O., et al. (2017) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.02.026 · Cited by 837
Disrupting reconsolidation: Pharmacological and behavioral manipulations
Soeter, M., & Kindt, M. (2011) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.2148511 · Cited by 262
Reconsolidation in a human fear conditioning study: A test of extinction as updating mechanism
Kindt, M., & Soeter, M. (2013) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.09.016 · Cited by 240
Retrieval per se is not sufficient to trigger reconsolidation of human fear memory
Sevenster, D., Beckers, T., & Kindt, M. (2012) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2012.01.009 · Cited by 238
Deficient safety learning characterizes high trait anxious individuals
Gazendam, F. J., Kamphuis, J. H., & Kindt, M. (2012) · Biological Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.11.006 · Cited by 168
Metadata
- Authors
- Pineles, S. L., Orr, M. R., & Orr, S. P.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- University of Alabama in Huntsville (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Orr, Scott P.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 984-995
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- PMC
- PMC2868319
- OpenAlex
- W1992253412
- Cited by
- 149
- References
- 78
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 13
- FWCI
- 3.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Psychophysiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH060315, R01-MH60315)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Keywords
- skin conductance, differential fear conditioning, aversive conditioning, orienting response, conditioned response, shock aversion
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Conditioning, Psychological, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Male, Reference Standards, Police
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
