Cited by 210Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMemory and Neural MechanismsPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Fear conditioning in panic disorder: Enhanced resistance to extinction

Open access
Michael, Tanja, Blechert, Jens, Vriends, Noortje, Margraf, Jürgen, Wilhelm, Frank H.·2007·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Enhanced conditionability has been proposed as a crucial factor in the etiology and maintenance of panic disorder (PD). To test this assumption, the authors of the current study examined the acquisition and extinction of conditioned responses to aversive stimuli in PD. Thirty-nine PD patients and 33 healthy control participants took part in a differential aversive conditioning experiment. A highly annoying but not painful electrical stimulus served as the unconditioned stimulus (US), and two neutral pictures were used as either the paired conditioned stimulus (CS+) or the unpaired conditioned stimulus (CS-). Results indicate that PD patients do not show larger conditioned responses during acquisition than control participants. However, in contrast to control participants, PD patients exhibited larger skin conductance responses to CS+ stimuli during extinction and maintained a more negative evaluation of them, as indicated by valence ratings obtained several times throughout the experiment. This suggests that PD patients show enhanced conditionability with respect to extinction.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0021-843x.116.3.612

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PTSD patients show impaired fear extinction.

    “PTSD patients show impaired fear extinction (Blechert, Michael, Vriends, Margraf, & Wilhelm, 2007; Michael, Blechert, Vriends, Margraf, & Wilhelm, 2007; Milad et al., 2009)”

    From Nicotine addiction and psychiatric disorders (2015) · cites this paper as Michael et al., 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 40 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Michael, T., Blechert, J., Vriends, N., Margraf, J., & Wilhelm, F. H.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2007-08
Volume
116
Issue
3
Pages
612-617
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2027993054
Cited by
210
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 29 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 13
FWCI
11.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Funders
  • Swiss National Science Foundation (105311-104038; 105311-105850)
  • Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft Basel
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
panic disorder, fear conditioning, extinction, conditioned response acquisition, skin conductance response, aversive stimuli, stimulus valence, differential conditioning
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Attitude, Conditioning, Classical, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Panic Disorder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review