The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of peak oxygen uptake from sub‐maximal ratings of perceived exertion elicited during a graded exercise test in obese women
Abstract
The purpose was to assess the validity of predicting peak oxygen uptake from Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE)≤15, during a graded exercise test (GXT), in obese women. Forty‐three obese women performed GXT to volitional exhaustion. During GXT, oxygen uptake and RPE were measured. Individual linear regressions between and RPE≤15 were extrapolated to RPE 20 in order to predict . Actual and predicted were not significantly different (13.9±3.0 vs 14.2±3.3 ml kg−1 min−1, respectively; p=.26). The Pearson product moment correlation between actual and predicted was high (r=0.82). The 95% limits of agreement analysis on these values (bias±1.96SD) was −0.3±3.7 ml kg−1 min−1. Results suggested that RPE≤15 elicited during a sub‐maximal GXT provides accurate prediction. Therefore, it is not necessary to perform GXT to voluntary exhaustion to determine in obese women.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In addition to alterations being taken for well-trained athletes, alterations in traditional protocols have also been created to accommodate lower fitness levels in obese individuals (9).”
From Comparison of a Continuous and Discontinuous GXT on VO2 in Resistance-Trained and Endurance-Trained Males (2022) · cites this paper as [9]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Perceived exertion as an indicator of somatic stress
Borg, G. (1970) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/1650197719702239298 · Cited by 4,707
American College of Sports Medicine position stand
Otis, C. L. (1997) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 4,407
Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales
Borg, G. A. V. (1998) · Cited by 3,366
Pollock, M. L., Gaesser, G. A., Butcher, J. D., Despr??s, J.-P., Dishman, R. K., Franklin, B. A., & Garber, C. E. (1998) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199806000-00032 · Cited by 3,051
Borg's Perceived Exertion and Pain Scales
Heath, E. M. (1998) · Medicine& Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199809000-00018 · Cited by 3,037
Chen, M. J., Fan, X., & Moe, S. T. (2002) · Journal of Sports Sciences · doi:10.1080/026404102320761787 · Cited by 819
Ulmer, H. V. (1996) · Experientia · doi:10.1007/bf01919309 · Cited by 385
Bayne, H., Tucker, R., & Noakes, T. D. (2008) · European Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1007/s00421-008-0741-7 · Cited by 232
Noakes, T. D. (2004) · Journal of Applied Physiology · doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.01124.2003 · Cited by 172
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Noble B. J., 1996, Perceived exertion
Cited by
Elsangedy, H. M., Krinski, K., Costa, E. C., Haile, L., Fonteles, A. I., Timossi, L. D. S., & Gregorio da Silva, S. (2013) · Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness · doi:10.1016/j.jesf.2013.11.002 · Cited by 21
(2022) · International Journal of Exercise Science · doi:10.70252/nhay2400 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Coquart, J. B. J., Lemaire, C., Dubart, A., Douillard, C., Luttenbacher, D., Wibaux, F., & Garcin, M.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-10-12
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1150-1153
- ISSN
- 0048-5772
- 1469-8986
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 20
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
