The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings
Open accessAbstract
To determine whether data quality is meaningfully reduced by high electrode impedance, EEG was recorded simultaneously from low- and high-impedance electrode sites during an oddball task. Low-frequency noise was found to be increased at high-impedance sites relative to low-impedance sites, especially when the recording environment was warm and humid. The increased noise at the high-impedance sites caused an increase in the number of trials needed to obtain statistical significance in analyses of P3 amplitude, but this could be partially mitigated by high-pass filtering and artifact rejection. High electrode impedance did not reduce statistical power for the N1 wave unless the recording environment was warm and humid. Thus, high electrode impedance may increase noise and decrease statistical power under some conditions, but these effects can be reduced by using a cool and dry recording environment and appropriate signal processing methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009 · Cited by 24,371
Picton, T. W., Bentin, S., Berg, P., Donchin, E., Hillyard, S. A., Johnson, R., Miller, G. A., Ritter, W., Ruchkin, D. S., Rugg, M. D., et al. (2000) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/1469-8986.3720127 · Cited by 2,157
Cited by
Keil, A., Debener, S., Gratton, G., Junghöfer, M., Kappenman, E. S., Luck, S. J., Luu, P., Miller, G. A., & Yee, C. M. (2014) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.12147 · Cited by 699
Self-citationLost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering
Braboszcz, C., & Delorme, A. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.008 · Cited by 425
Unobtrusive ambulatory EEG using a smartphone and flexible printed electrodes around the ear
Debener, S., Emkes, R., De Vos, M., & Bleichner, M. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep16743 · Cited by 382
Automagic: Standardized preprocessing of big EEG data
Pedroni, A., Bahreini, A., & Langer, N. (2019) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.06.046 · Cited by 292
EEG power spectral measures of cognitive workload: A meta‐analysis
Chikhi, S., Matton, N., & Blanchet, S. (2022) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/psyp.14009 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Kappenman, E. S., & Luck, S. J.
- Venue
- Psychophysiology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-03
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 888-904
- ISSN
- 0048-5772 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-8986
- OpenAlex
- W2158956772
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01009.x
- The paper
- Kappenman, E. S., & Luck, S. J. (2010). The effects of electrode impedance on data quality and statistical significance in ERP recordings. Psychophysiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01009.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.