CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 215Organic Food and AgricultureEconomic and Environmental ValuationConsumer Attitudes and Food Labeling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Women, men and organic food: differences in their attitudes and willingness to pay. A Spanish case study

Ureña, Félix, Bernabéu, Rodolfo, Olmeda, Miguel·2008·International Journal of Consumer Studies
DOI 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00637.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Abstract The main purpose of this work consists of displaying the different attitudes of men and women towards organic food, and their willingness to pay for it, in three different consumer intensities: usual, occasional and potential consumers. Several surveys have been carried out to obtain a representative sample of regular food purchasers living in Castilla‐La Mancha (Spain). Statistic analysis previously detecting significant differences with regard to gender and type of consumer has been conducted by univariate analysis to describe attitudes, and multivariate analysis, through ‘logit’ models, to calculate maximum willingness to pay. Results show that women have a more favourable attitude (directly related to their lifestyle) to the purchase and consumption of organic food than men, whereas men are inclined to pay a higher price for organic food than women. In general, men are disposed to pay a higher increase in price than women.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00637.x

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Aaker D.A., 1989, Investigación de Mercados
  2. Aguirre M.S., 2003, El consumidor ecológico: un modelo de comportamiento a partir de la recopilación y análisis de la evidencia empírica. Distribución y, Consumo, 67, 41
  3. Brugarolas M., 2005, Determination of the surplus that consumers are willing to pay for an organic wine. Spanish Journal, of Agricultural Research, 3, 43
  4. Canavos G.C., 1998, Probabilidad y Estadística. Aplicaciones y métodos
  5. Dobscha S., 2001, An ecofeminist análisis of environmentall sensitive women using qualitative methodology: the emancipatory potencial o fan ecological life, Sensitive Women Using Qualitative Methodology, 20, 201
  6. Dubois B., 1999, Comportamiento Del Consumidor. Comprendiendo Al Consumidor
  7. Fraj E., 2002, Comportamiento de Consumidor Ecológico
  8. Gil J.M., 2000, Potencial de Mercado de Los Productos Ecológicos en Aragón
  9. Gracia A., 1998, Potencial del Mercado de Los Productos Ecológicos en Aragón
  10. Hartman & New Hope, 1997, The Evolving Organic Marketplace
  11. McGarry M., 2002, Consumer attitudes toward organically grown lettuce. Journal, of Food Distribution Research, 33, 155
  12. Misra S., 1991, Consumer willingness to pay for pesticide‐free fresh produce. Western Journal, of Agricultural Economics, 16, 218
  13. Noomene R.(2005)Actitudes del consumidor español ante los alimentos modificados genéticamente (OGM). Thesis Master of Science. Mediterranean Agronomic Institut Zaragoza (Spain).
  14. Pearson D., 2001, How to increase organic food sales: results from research based on market segmentation and product attributes, Australasian Agribusiness Review, 9, 8
  15. Pedret R., 2003, Herramientas Para Segmentar Mercados y Posicionar Productos. Análisis de Información Cuantitativa en Investigación Comercial
  16. Rozan A., 2004, Willingness‐to‐pay for food safety: an experimental investigation of quality certification on bidding behaviour. European Review, of Agricultural Economics, 31, 409
  17. Sánchez G., 2000, Técnicas de Análisis de Datos en Investigación de Mercados, 431
  18. Sánchez M., 2001, Diferencias entre los segmentos del mercado en la disposición a pagar por un alimento ecológico: valoración contingente y análisis conjunto. Revista de, Estudios Agrosociales y Pesqueros, 190, 141
  19. Wilkinson S., 1994, Women and Health: Feminist Perspectives

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 215

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Ureña, F., Bernabéu, R., & Olmeda, M.
Affiliations
University of Castilla-La Mancha (ES)
Venue
International Journal of Consumer Studies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-27
Volume
32
Issue
1
Pages
18-26
ISSN
  • 1470-6423 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-6431
DOI
10.1111/j.1470-6431.2007.00637.x
OpenAlex
W2056773409
Cited by
215
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.43
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
International Journal of Consumer Studies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Organic Food and Agriculture
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Keywords
organic food, gender differences, consumer attitudes, willingness to pay, price premium, lifestyle, Castilla-La Mancha

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review