Cited by 180Land Rights and ReformsAgriculture, Land Use, Rural DevelopmentAfrican studies and sociopolitical issues

More Than Socially Embedded: The Distinctive Character of “Communal Tenure” Regimes in South Africa and its Implications for Land Policy

Open access
COUSINS, BEN·2007·Journal of Agrarian Change

Abstract

This article analyzes debates over tenure reform policy in post‐apartheid South Africa, with a particular focus on the controversial Communal Land Rights Act of 2004. Land tenure systems in the ‘communal areas’ of South Africa are described as dynamic and evolving regimes within which a number of important commonalities and continuities over time are observable. Key underlying principles of pre‐colonial land relations are identified, which informed the adaptation and modification of tenure regimes in the colonial era and under policies of segregation and apartheid, and continue to do so today. Exploring the policy implications of this analysis, the article suggests that alternative approaches to that embodied in the Communal Land Rights Act are required. The most appropriate approach is to make socially legitimate occupation and use rights, as they are currently held and practised, the point of departure for both their recognition in law and for the design of institutional frameworks for administering land.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0366.2007.00147.x

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cousins and Hall have extensively criticized market-based land reform approaches and advocated for more inclusive, pro-poor strategies.

    “For instance, Cousins and Hall have extensively criticized market-based land reform approaches and advocated for more inclusive, pro-poor strategies [18,29].”

    From How Has South Africa's Land Reform Policy Performed from 1994 to 2024? Insights from a Review of Literature (2025) · cites this paper as [18]

    In 'Alternative Approaches to Tenure Reform' and the Conclusion (page unavailable), Cousins argues against individual titling and advocates securing existing land rights through more democratic administration and support for rights holders. That supports the inclusive-reform part of the claim, but this paper does not specifically critique market-based land reform approaches, establish that the criticism was extensive, or speak for Hall. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There is widespread uncertainty in former homeland areas about the validity of documents, procedures for transferring land within families, and legality of leasing or selling land rights.

    “there is widespread uncertainty about the validity of documents (e.g., permission-to-occupy certificates), the appropriate procedures for transferring land within families, and the legality of leasing or selling rights to land (Ntsebeza 2006;Cousins 2007).”

    From Agricultural Land Redistribution and Land Administration in Sub-Saharan Africa: Case Studies of Recent Reforms (2014) · cites this paper as Cousins 2007

    The Contemporary Period and Tenure Reform in Post-Apartheid South Africa sections describe unclear land-administration rules, uneven use of Permission to Occupy certificates, and differing practices around land sales. They support widespread uncertainty about land rights, but do not specifically establish uncertainty about the validity of certificates, procedures for transfers within families, or the legality of leasing rights. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Under customary land tenure systems, rights are both individual (the holding) and communal (the commons).

    “4) Rights are both individual (the holding) and communal (the commons).”
  • Under customary land tenure systems, rights are derived from accepted membership of a social unit, either through birth or acquired allegiance.

    “2) Rights are derived from accepted membership of a social unit (kinship ties), either through birth or acquired allegiance.”
  • Customary land tenure systems allow multiple uses and users of resources.

    “3) They allow multiple uses (e.g., farming, fishing, occupation) and users (e.g., farmers, migrants, herders, residents) of resources.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [9]9. Berry, Sara, 1990. 'Land Tenure and Agricultural Performance in Africa: Report on a Conference'. Paper on Conference on Rural Land Tenure, Credit, Agricultural Investment, and Farm Productivity, 4 -8 June 1990. Nairobi. 14710366, 2007, 3, . See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed the applicable Creative Commons License 2007 The Author. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Henry Bernstein and Terence J. Byres. Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 7 No. 3, July 2007, pp. 281-315.
  2. [12]12. Bohannon, Paul, 1963. ' "Land", "Tenure", and "Land Tenure" '. In African Agrarian Systems, ed. Daniel Biebuyck, 101-15. London: Oxford University Press.
  3. [13]13. Chanock, Martin, 1991. 'Paradigms, Policies and Property: A Review of the Customary Law of Land Tenure'. In Law in Colonial Africa, eds Kristin Mann and Richard Roberts, 61-84. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
  4. [20]20. Claassens, Aninka and Sizani Ngubane, 2003. 'Rural Women, Land Rights and the Communal Land Rights Bill'. Unpublished paper presented to conference on 'Women and the Law', Cape Town, Women's Legal Centre.
  5. [21]21. Colson, Elizabeth, 1963. 'Land Rights and Land Use Among the Valley Tonga of the Rhodesian Federation: the Background to the Kariba Resettlement Programme'. In African Agrarian Systems, ed. Daniel Biebuyck, 137-56. London: Oxford University Press.
  6. [22]22. Colson, Elizabeth, 1971. 'The Impact of the Colonial Period on the Definition of Land Rights'. In The Impact of Colonialism, ed. Victor Turner, 193-215. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  7. [28]28. © 2007 The Author. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Henry Bernstein and Terence J. Byres. Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 7 No. 3, July 2007, pp. 281-315.
  8. [30]30. Cross, Catherine, 1994. 'Shack Tenure in Durban'. In Here to Stay. Informal Settlements in KwaZulu-Natal, eds Doug Hindson and Jeff McCarthy, 170-90. Durban: Indicator Press.
  9. [39]39. Ferguson, Cathy and Mpilo Sithole, 2004. 'Intersection of Schemes and Customary Land Use Issues'. Paper presented to workshop on 'Aligning Development Planning with Communal Tenure Arrangements -in the context of changing legislation', Midnet and Legal Entity Assessment Project, Pietermaritzburg.
  10. [48]48. Kingwill, Rosalie, 1996. 'Quitrent Tenure'. Material prepared for a training course on South African Land Tenure and Policy, Programme for Land and Agrarian Studies, 14710366, 2007, 3, . See the Terms and Conditions (https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/terms-and-conditions) on Wiley Online Library for rules of use; OA articles are governed the applicable Creative Commons License 2007 The Author. Journal compilation © 2007 Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Henry Bernstein and Terence J. Byres. Journal of Agrarian Change, Vol. 7 No. 3, July 2007, pp. 281-315.
  11. [55]55. Levin, Richard and Sam Mkhabela, 1997. 'The Chieftaincy, Land Allocation and Democ- racy'. In 'No More Tears'. Struggles for Land in Mpumalanga, South Africa, eds Richard Levin and Daniel Weiner, 153 -173. Trenton: Africa World Press.
  12. [62]62. Mathieu, Paul, Mahamadou Zongo and Lucinan Pare, 2003. 'Monetary Land Transactions in Western Burkino Faso: Commoditisation, Papers and Ambiguities'. In Securing Land Rights in Africa, eds Tor A. Benjaminsen and Christian Lund, 109-28. London: Frank Cass.
  13. [63]63. Mbeki, Govan, 1964. The Peasant's Revolt. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
  14. [66]66. Murray, Christina, 2004. South Africa's Troubled Royalty: Traditional Leaders After Democracy. Canberra: Federation Press in association with the Centre for International and Public Law, Australian National University (Law and Policy Paper No. 3).
  15. [69]69. Ntsebeza, Lungisile, 2003. 'Structures and Struggles of Rural Local Government in South Africa: the Case of Traditional Authorities in the Eastern Cape'. PhD thesis. Rhodes University.
  16. [80]80. Royston, Lauren, 2004. 'Barking Dogs and Building Bridges: A Contribution to Making Sense of Hernando de Soto's Ideas in Our Context'. Paper presented to workshop on 'The Perpetual Challenge of Informal Settlements', Wits University, 8-10 November 2004.
  17. [87]87. Shipton, Parker and Mitzi Goheen, 1992. 'Understanding African Landholding: Power, Wealth, and Meaning'. Africa, 62 (3): 307-25.
  18. [88]88. Sibanda, Sipho, 2004. 'Principles Underpinning the Communal Land Rights Bill 2001'. In National Land Tenure Conference. Finding Solutions, Securing Rights, eds Michael Roth, Vuyi Nxasana, Sipho Sibanda and Teresa Yates, 156-84. Durban: LexisNexis Butterworths.
  19. [89]89. Sithole, Mpilo, 2004. 'Communal Land Tenure Versus Individual Housing Tenure? Working Together in Housing Provision'. Paper presented to the National Rural Housing Symposium, Johannesburg, 13 May 2004.
  20. [95]95. Walker, Cherryl, 2002. 'Panel Discussion: Ensuring Women's Land Rights. Moderator's Comments'. Paper presented to a World Bank Regional Workshop on Land Issues in Africa and the Middle East, Kampala, Uganda, 29 April-2 May 2002.
  21. [99]99. Ziqubu, N., T. Cousins and D. Hornby, 2001. 'Using Local Practices and Records to Secure Individual Tenure Rights in Common Property Situations'. Paper presented to the National Land Tenure Conference, Durban, 26-30 November 2001.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
COUSINS, B.
Affiliations
University of the Western Cape (ZA)
Corresponding author
COUSINS, BEN
Venue
Journal of Agrarian Change
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-06-03
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
281-315
ISSN
  • 1471-0358 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0366
OpenAlex
W2024647577
Cited by
180
References
67
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 11
FWCI
17.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Agrarian Change (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • UWC Research Repository (University of the Western Cape) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Land Rights and Reforms
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › General Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › African studies and sociopolitical issues
Keywords
communal land tenure, land tenure reform, communal areas, colonial land policy, land rights recognition, South Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review