Cited by 243Sex work and related issuesMigration and Exile StudiesAnthropological Studies and Insights

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

New slavery, old binaries: human trafficking and the borders of ‘freedom’

DAVIDSON, JULIA O'CONNELL·2010·Global Networks

Abstract

This article explores dominant discourse on ‘trafficking as modern slavery’ in relation to the many legal and social fetters that have historically been and are today imposed upon individuals who are socially imagined as ‘free’. It argues that discourse on ‘trafficking as modern slavery’ revitalizes the liberal understandings of freedom and restriction that have historically allowed vigorous moral condemnation of slavery to coexist with the continued imposition of extensive, forcible restrictions on individuals deemed to be ‘free’. In place of efforts to build political alliances between different groups of migrants, as well as between migrants and non‐migrants, who share a common interest in transforming existing social and political relations, ‘trafficking as modern slavery’ discourse inspires and legitimates efforts to divide a small number of ‘deserving victims’ from the masses that remain ‘undeserving’ of rights and freedoms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0374.2010.00284.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recognising that denial of agency and unfreedom of labour become slavery at some point along a spectrum does not necessitate the conclusion that anything not meeting the threshold of slavery is therefore considered 'appropriate exploitation'.

    “This does not, as O ' Connell Davidson suggests, necessitate a conclusion that anything not meeting the threshold of slavery is therefore considered ' appropriate exploitation ' .”
  • The existence of economic freedom among enslaved persons in nineteenth century North America runs counter to the argument of scholars who suggest that the construction of slavery as a category creates a binary.

    “This runs counter to the argument of scholars who suggest that the construction of slavery as a category creates a binary (for instance, O ' Connell Davidson 2010).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Agustín L., 2007, Sex at the margins
  2. Anderson B., 2000, Doing the dirty work
  3. Anderson B.(2007) ‘Battles in time: the relationship between global and labour mobilities’ Centre on Migration Policy and Society Working Paper no. 55 University of Oxford.
  4. Anderson B., 2003, IOM Migration Research Series
  5. Anderson B., 2008, Sex, slaves and citizens: the politics of anti‐trafficking, Soundings, 40, 135, 10.3898/136266208820465065 · DOI
  6. Anderson B., 2005, Free market, forced labour?
  7. 10.1057/9780230584228 · DOI
  8. Bales K., 2000, Disposable people: new slavery in the global economy
  9. Bales K.(2007) ‘Defining slavery’ http://www.freetheslaves.net. · DOI
  10. 10.4324/9780203453032 · DOI
  11. Bauman Z., 1998, Globalization: the human consequences
  12. Beckles H., 1989, Natural rebels: a social history of enslaved black women in Barbados
  13. 10.1111/1467-9760.00111 · DOI
  14. Brace L., 2004, The politics of property: freedom and belonging
  15. 10.1515/9781400827473 · DOI
  16. Calavita K., 2004, Labour versus empire, 133
  17. Chapkis W., 2005, Regulating sex, 51
  18. Cohen R., 1987, The new helots: migrants in the international division of labour
  19. Cohen R., 2006, Migration and its enemies: global capital, migrant labour and the nation state
  20. Craig G.(2007) ‘Slavery: alive and well and living in the UK’ The Regional Review Summer 20–1.
  21. Craig G., 2007, Contemporary slavery in the UK: overview and key issues
  22. Craven P., 1994, Unfree labour in the development of the Atlantic world, 71
  23. 10.1177/0261018305051330 · DOI
  24. 10.1007/s12147-999-0021-9 · DOI
  25. Fiengold D., 1998, Sex, drugs and the IMF: some implications of “structural adjustment” for the trade in heroin, girls and women in the Upper Mekong Region, Refuge, 1, 4, 10.25071/1920-7336.21984 · DOI
  26. Geary D., 2004, Mitteilungsblatt des Instituts fuer Soziale Bewegungen
  27. Gibson I., 1978, The English vice
  28. 10.1080/14616740500065089 · DOI
  29. Hathaway J., 2008, The human rights quagmire of “human trafficking”, Virginia Journal of International Law, 49, 1
  30. Human Rights Watch, 2006, Building towers, cheating workers: exploitation of migrant construction workers in the United Arab Emirates, HRW, 18
  31. ILO, 2005, A global alliance against forced labour
  32. Jacobsen C.andD.Stenvoll(2008) ‘Muslim women and foreign prostitutes: female victimhood subjects and the state’ paper for the Progemi Workshop ‘Conceptualizations of Trafficking’ Fafo Oslo 22–23 May.
  33. Kapur R., 2005, Erotic justice: law and the new politics of postcolonialism
  34. Kaye M., 2003, The migration‐trafficking nexus: combating trafficking through the protection of migrants' human rights
  35. Kempadoo K., 1998, Global sex workers: rights, resistance and redefinition
  36. Levine P., 2003, Prostitution, race and politics
  37. Lim L., 1998, The sex sector: the economic and social bases of prostitution in Southeast Asia
  38. Lively A., 1999, Blackness, race and the imagination
  39. Lott T., 1998, Subjugation and bondage, 99
  40. MacInnes J., 1998, The end of masculinity
  41. Marshall P., 2005, Trafficking and prostitution reconsidered., 43
  42. Midgley C., 1998, Gender and imperialism, 161
  43. Miles R., 1987, Capitalism and unfree labour
  44. Moravcsik J., 1998, Subjugation and bondage, 171
  45. Nzula A., 1979, Forced labour in colonial Africa
  46. O'Connell Davidson J., 2005, Children in the global sex trade
  47. 10.1057/palgrave.fr.9400278 · DOI
  48. Patterson O., 1982, Slavery and social death
  49. Pearson E., 2002, Human traffic, human rights: redefining victim protection
  50. Phongpaichit P., 1999, Illegal immigration and commercial sex: the new slave trade, 74
  51. 10.1215/00382876-103-2-3-297 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Rogers N., 1994, Unfree labour in the development of the Atlantic world, 102
  53. Roopnarine L., 2007, Indo‐Caribbean indenture: resistance and accommodation, 1838–1920
  54. 10.2979/NWS.2005.17.3.64 · DOI
  55. Steinfeld R., 1991, The invention of free labor
  56. 10.1017/CBO9780511549564 · DOI
  57. Weissbrodt D., 2002, Abolishing slavery and its contemporary forms
  58. 10.1177/0032329207304319 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
DAVIDSON, J. O.
Affiliations
University of Nottingham (GB)
Corresponding author
DAVIDSON, JULIA O'CONNELL
Venue
Global Networks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
244-261
ISSN
  • 1470-2266 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0374
OpenAlex
W2033555204
Cited by
243
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 6
FWCI
23.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Global Networks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sex work and related issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Migration and Exile Studies
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Anthropological Studies and Insights
Keywords
human trafficking, freedom, restriction, migrant rights

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review