The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN THE ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT
Abstract
Summary: A method of estimating fetal weight by ultrasonic measurement of the fetal abdominal circumference is described. Assessment of birth weight predictions on 140 fetuses who were delivered within 48 hours of this measurement showed that the accuracy of predictions varied with the size of the fetus; at a predicted weight of 1 kg, 95 per cent of birth weights fell within 160 g, while at 2 kg, 3 kg and 4 kg the corresponding values were 290 g, 450 g and 590 g respectively. Expressed as a percentage of the predicted weight, confidence limits remained constant throughout the birth weight range. Extrapolation of these data to routine screening of the obstetric population showed that with a single measurement at 32 weeks menstrual age, 87 per cent of babies below the 5th centile would be detected by this method but that the diagnosis rate would fall to 63 per cent at 38 weeks. The false positive diagnosis rate would remain constant between 32 and 38 weeks at just over 1 per cent.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Robinson, H. P. (1973) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.4.5883.28 · Cited by 392
Cited by
A systematic review of the ultrasound estimation of fetal weight
Dudley, N. J. (2005) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.1751 · Cited by 537
The estimation of fetal weight by computer-assisted analysis
Warsof, S. L., Gohari, P., Berkowitz, R. L., & Hobbins, J. C. (1977) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(77)90058-8 · Cited by 355
Manning, F. A., Hill, C. M., & Platt, L. D. (1981) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(81)90004-1 · Cited by 273
Predicting delivery date by ultrasound and last menstrual period in early gestation
Taipale, P. (2001) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1016/s0029-7844(00)01131-5 · Cited by 216
Hammami, A., Mazer Zumaeta, A., Syngelaki, A., Akolekar, R., & Nicolaides, K. H. (2018) · Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1002/uog.19066 · Cited by 170
Metadata
- Authors
- Campbell, S., & Wilkin, D.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1975-09
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 689-697
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W2073596188
- Cited by
- 542
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN THE ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00708.x
- The paper
- Campbell, S., & Wilkin, D. (1975). ULTRASONIC MEASUREMENT OF FETAL ABDOMEN CIRCUMFERENCE IN THE ESTIMATION OF FETAL WEIGHT. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.1975.tb00708.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.