Cited by 100Pregnancy and preeclampsia studiesMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

An audit of the detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies

HEPBURN, MARY, ROSENBERG, KATHRYN·1986·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

The detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies (SGA) was assessed in a case record review of 1302 randomly selected pregnancies. Of the 129 babies with birthweights below the 10th centile for gestational age, 34 (26%) were identified antenatally. For every two correctly identified SGA babies there were three false positive predictions. In-patient monitoring and early elective delivery occurred both in the correctly identified pregnancies (24%) and in the false positives (12%). The management of suspected pregnancies bore no apparent relation to test results and appeared arbitrary. Mortality and morbidity, as measured by nursery admission for greater than 48 h and retention in the nursery after the mother's discharge, were higher in SGA babies than in the hospital population as a whole. The number of ill babies was small, however, reflecting the heterogeneous aetiology of small size for gestational age. Moreover, antenatal detection had little influence on these measures of outcome. It is concluded that tests for detection of SGA babies remain imprecise in practice, gestational weight alone correlates poorly with fetal well-being, and the need remains for sensitive tests to detect babies with genuine morbidity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1986.tb07895.x

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HEPBURN, M., & ROSENBERG, K.
Affiliations
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde (GB)
Corresponding author
HEPBURN, MARY
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1986-03
Volume
93
Issue
3
Pages
212-216
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2150136389
Cited by
100
References
7
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
8.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
false positive prediction, fetal well-being, neonatal morbidity, neonatal mortality, gestational weight, birthweight centiles
MeSH terms
Birth Weight, False Positive Reactions, Female, Humans, Infant Mortality, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Small for Gestational Age, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review