Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Incidence of severe pre‐eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis as a surrogate marker for severe maternal morbidity in a European population‐based study: the MOMS‐B survey

Open access
Zhang, Wei‐Hong, Alexander, Sophie, Bouvier‐Colle, Marie‐Hélène, Macfarlane, Alison, the MOMS‐B Group·2005·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective To describe the incidence of three conditions of acute severe maternal morbidity in selected regions in nine European countries. Design A population‐based questionnaire survey. Setting Eleven regions in nine countries of Europe. Population All the pregnant women in each region who had delivered during the period covered by the study. Methods Standard definitions of three severe obstetric conditions, pre‐eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis were established by a steering committee. A common questionnaire was used in each participating country. The incidence of the three obstetric conditions and characteristics of the study women were compared. Main outcome measures Incidence of three severe obstetric conditions: pre‐eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis. Results The study identified 1734 women with at least one of the three conditions, with 847 experiencing severe haemorrhage, 793 experiencing severe pre‐eclampsia and 142 experiencing severe sepsis. There were wide variations in incidence of three conditions combined, ranging from 14.7 per thousand deliveries in Brussels, Belgium to 6.0 per thousand deliveries in Upper Austria. Conclusions This study sets a simple and straightforward approach to the definition of three severe obstetric conditions and allows population‐based comparisons between developed countries in Europe, even though difficulties may have been present with applying the definition across countries. The reported incidence of these severe obstetric conditions in general and severe haemorrhage varied significantly between countries. Overall, severe haemorrhage in particular was the most common of the three conditions, followed closely by severe pre‐eclampsia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00303.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., Alexander, S., Bouvier‐Colle, M., Macfarlane, A., & the MOMS‐B Group
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10-22
Volume
112
Issue
1
Pages
89-96
ISSN
  • 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
OpenAlex
W2081560117
Cited by
192
References
1
FWCI
3.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence of severe pre‐eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis as a surrogate marker for severe maternal morbidity in a European population‐based study: the MOMS‐B survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00303.x
The paper
Zhang, W., Alexander, S., Bouvier‐Colle, M., Macfarlane, A., & the MOMS‐B Group. (2005). Incidence of severe pre‐eclampsia, postpartum haemorrhage and sepsis as a surrogate marker for severe maternal morbidity in a European population‐based study: the MOMS‐B survey. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00303.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.