Cited by 47Pelvic floor disorders treatmentsHernia repair and managementUterine Myomas and Treatments

Indications, Contraindications, and Complications of Mesh in Surgical Treatment of Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Open access
ELLINGTON, DAVID R., RICHTER, HOLLY E.·2013·Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

Women are seeking care for pelvic organ prolapse in increasing numbers and a significant proportion of them will undergo a second repair for recurrence. This has initiated interest by both surgeons and industry to utilize and design prosthetic mesh materials to help augment longevity of prolapse repairs. Unfortunately, the introduction of transvaginal synthetic mesh kits for use in women was done without the benefit of level 1 data to determine its utility compared with native tissue repair. This report summarizes the potential benefit/risks of transvaginal synthetic mesh use for pelvic organ prolapse and recommendations regarding its continued use.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/grf.0b013e318282f2e8

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [13]American Urogynecologic Society Response: FDA Safety Communication: Update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse 7 2011 22086260
  2. [14]Society for Female Urology and Urodynamics Response: FDA Safety Communication: Update on serious complications associated with transvaginal placement of surgical mesh for pelvic organ prolapse 7 2011 22086260

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
ELLINGTON, D. R., & RICHTER, H. E.
Affiliations
University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
Venue
Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2013-06
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
276-288
ISSN
0009-9201 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2312527982
Cited by
47
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (K24DK068389)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hernia repair and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Uterine Myomas and Treatments
Keywords
pelvic organ prolapse, mesh augmentation, native tissue repair, indications and contraindications, surgical complications
MeSH terms
Contraindications, Female, Humans, Postoperative Complications, Surgical Mesh, Pelvic Organ Prolapse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review