Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 68

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Occupational predictors of pregnancy outcomes in Irish working women in the Lifeways cohort

Niedhammer, I, O’Mahony, D, Daly, S, Morrison, JJ, Kelleher, CC, the Lifeways Cross‐Generation Cohort Study Steering Group·2009·BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study was to explore the association between occupational factors and pregnancy outcomes in a prospective cohort of Irish pregnant women. Design This study has a prospective design. Population The Lifeways cohort included 1124 pregnant women, 676 of whom delivered a single baby and were working at their first prenatal care visit when they filled in a self‐administered questionnaire. Methods Occupational factors were measured using this questionnaire and included eight factors describing job and working conditions. Data including pregnancy outcomes were also obtained from clinical hospital records. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for well‐known risk factors. Main outcome measures Birthweight (≤3000 g and ≤2500 g), preterm delivery (<37 gestation weeks) and small‐for‐gestational‐age. Results Significant associations were found between physical work demands and low birthweight (≤2500 g) and working with between a temporary contract and preterm delivery. Trends were also observed between working 40 hours or more a week and shift work, and birthweight of 3000 g or less. The study of a cumulative index showed that being exposed to at least two of these occupational factors significantly predicted birthweight of ≤3000 g (OR = 2.44, 95% CI: 1.17–5.08) and of ≤2500 g (OR = 4.65, 95% CI: 1.08–20.07) and preterm delivery (OR = 5.18, 95% CI: 1.00–27.01). Conclusions Our findings suggest that occupational factors may predict birthweight through their predictive effects on preterm delivery. This is one of the few prospective studies on pregnancy outcomes that include working conditions. As they may be modifiable, occupational factors deserve more attention in relation to birth outcomes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02160.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1542/peds.2004-2695 · DOI
  2. Whincup P, 2008, Birth weight and risk of type 2 diabetes: a quantitative systematic review of published evidence, J Epidemiol Community Health, 62, A15
  3. 10.1136/oem.2006.026872 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/S0029-7844(99)00598-0 · DOI
  5. Nurminen T, 1998, Shift work and reproductive health, Scand J Work Environ Health, 24, 28
  6. 10.1093/occmed/kqm038 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10995-007-0264-6 · DOI
  8. 10.1097/00001648-199907000-00015 · DOI
  9. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116284 · DOI
  10. 10.2105/AJPH.86.6.825 · DOI
  11. 10.2105/AJPH.2004.058552 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/aje/kwm171 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s004200100259 · DOI
  14. 10.5271/sjweh.56 · DOI
  15. 10.2105/AJPH.80.2.173 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/0002-9378(95)90354-2 · DOI
  17. 10.1002/ajim.20496 · DOI
  18. 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31815d8dcb · DOI
  19. 10.2105/AJPH.81.8.1007 · DOI
  20. 10.1136/jech.2003.008029 · DOI
  21. 10.5271/sjweh.300 · DOI
  22. 10.1136/oem.51.7.470 · DOI
  23. 10.1097/00001648-199709000-00010 · DOI
  24. 10.1093/ije/23.4.764 · DOI
  25. 10.1097/00001648-200111000-00025 · DOI
  26. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000189080.76998.f8 · DOI
  27. 10.1097/00043764-199811000-00013 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.12.002 · DOI
  29. Murrin C, 2007, Self‐reported pre‐pregnancy maternal body mass index and infant birth‐weight, Ir Med J, 100, 20
  30. O’Mahony D, 2007, The Lifeways Cross‐Generation Study: design, recruitment and data management considerations, Ir Med J, 100, 3
  31. Segonds‐Pichon A, 2007, Socio‐demographic, lifestyle and cross‐generation predictors of self‐rated health in mothers during pregnancy, Ir Med J, 100, 7
  32. 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00371-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1186/1471-2393-8-5 · DOI
  34. Leclerc A, 2004, Incidence of shoulder pain in repetitive work, Occup Environ Med, 61, 39
  35. 10.1007/BF00378369 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/ije/dyi024 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.annepidem.2007.04.001 · DOI
  38. 10.1097/01.AOG.0000182580.78402.d2 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Niedhammer, I., O’Mahony, D., Daly, S., Morrison, J., Kelleher, C., & the Lifeways Cross‐Generation Cohort Study Steering Group
Venue
BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-05-11
Volume
116
Issue
7
Pages
943-952
ISSN
  • 1470-0328
  • 1471-0528
Cited by
68
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.