The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Bedside assessment of fibrinogen level in postpartum haemorrhage by thrombelastometry
Abstract
Objectives To establish whether reagent‐supported thrombelastometry with the rotation thrombelastometry system (ROTEM®) point‐of‐care device correlated with fibrinogen level in postpartum haemorrhages. Design Prospective observational study. Population and setting Ninety‐one women at the third trimester of pregnancy: 37 with postpartum haemorrhage (study group) and 54 without abnormal bleeding (control group). Methods Standard laboratory test results were compared with those obtained at bedside from the ROTEM with the FIBTEM® test (54 tests in the control group and 51 in the study group). Main outcome measures Analysis of correlations between fibrinogen levels and FIBTEM test results: clotting time (CT), clot amplitude at 5 and 15 minutes (CA 5; CA 15) and maximal amplitude [maximum clot firmness (MCF)]. Results Median fibrinogen level was significantly lower in the haemorrhage group than in the control group (3.4 and 5.1 g/l, respectively, P < 0.0001). Median CT was higher in the haemorrhage group than in the control group (P = 0.05). CA 5, CA 15 and MCF were significantly lower in the haemorrhage group than in controls (P < 0.0001) and strongly correlated with fibrinogen levels in both groups (r = 0.84–0.87, P < 0.0001). A cut‐off value of CA 5 at 5 mm and CA 15 at 6 mm presented an excellent sensitivity (100% for both parameters) and a good specificity (respectively 85 and 88%) to detect fibrinogen levels <1.5 g/l in postpartum haemorrhage. Conclusions The early parameters obtained from the FIBTEM test correlated well with fibrinogen levels. ROTEM might be helpful in guiding fibrinogen transfusion during postpartum haemorrhage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Management of severe perioperative bleeding: Guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology
Kozek-Langenecker, S. A., Afshari, A., Albaladejo, P., Santullano, C. A. A., De Robertis, E., Filipescu, D. C., Fries, D., Görlinger, K., Haas, T., Imberger, G., et al. (2013) · European Journal of Anaesthesiology · doi:10.1097/eja.0b013e32835f4d5b · Cited by 909
FIBTEM provides early prediction of massive transfusion in trauma
Schöchl, H., Cotton, B., Inaba, K., Nienaber, U., Fischer, H., Voelckel, W., & Solomon, C. (2011) · Critical Care · doi:10.1186/cc10539 · Cited by 313
Cortet, M., Deneux-Tharaux, C., Dupont, C., Colin, C., Rudigoz, R.-C., Bouvier-Colle, M.-H., & Huissoud, C. (2012) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aes096 · Cited by 305
Self-citationCollins, P. W., Lilley, G., Bruynseels, D., Laurent, D. B.-S., Cannings-John, R., Precious, E., Hamlyn, V., Sanders, J., Alikhan, R., Rayment, R., et al. (2014) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2014-04-567891 · Cited by 254
Mallaiah, S., Barclay, P., Harrod, I., Chevannes, C., & Bhalla, A. (2015) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.12859 · Cited by 213
Metadata
- Authors
- Huissoud, C., Carrabin, N., Audibert, F., Levrat, A., Massignon, D., Berland, M., & Rudigoz, R.
- Venue
- BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-06-10
- Volume
- 116
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 1097-1102
- ISSN
- 0306-5456 (ISSN-L)
- 1470-0328
- 1471-0528
- OpenAlex
- W1537359966
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bedside assessment of fibrinogen level in postpartum haemorrhage by thrombelastometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02187.x
- The paper
- Huissoud, C., Carrabin, N., Audibert, F., Levrat, A., Massignon, D., Berland, M., & Rudigoz, R. (2009). Bedside assessment of fibrinogen level in postpartum haemorrhage by thrombelastometry. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02187.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.