The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Information overload within the health care system: a literature review
Open accessAbstract
There is a widespread view held by health clinicians that their work effectiveness is impaired by ‘information overload.’ Building upon a previous work by Wilson, a review of the literature was undertaken to look for the evidence of this. It was found that the literature, particularly in the context of the clinical environment, was limited. This review explores the diverse overarching theories of information overload, effects of the phenomenon that are perceived to occur and proposed solutions to this problem. Many of the papers noted an information explosion but only three authors explicitly attempted to measure both the quantity and the complexity of this information. It was also found that the typology of the information studied was severely limited with most studies exploring information such as guidelines, access to journals, research findings and other knowledge intensive areas. Solutions proposed seem to concentrate on technological means rather than exploring the use of humans either in management of information or as a step in the filtering process.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Another way to reduce cognitive load is to minimize the physician's attention to extraneous information in the environment and decrease information overload.
“Another way to reduce cognitive load is to minimize the physician’s attention to extraneous information in the environment and decrease information overload56.”
From When better data meets better design: How EHR data usability and system usability shape physicians' cognitive load (2026) · cites this paper as [56]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 48
- 10.1177/146045820100700210 · DOI
- 10.7748/nm2003.06.10.3.8.c1927 · DOI
- Tidline T., 1999, The mythology of information overload, Library Trends, 47, 485
- Wilson C. E., 1976, Information discrimination: a human habit, Canadian Journal of Information Science, 1, 59
- 10.1108/EUM0000000006984 · DOI
- Marcusohn L. M., 1995, The information explosion in organisations, Swedish Library Research/Svensk Biblioteksforskning, 3, 25
- 10.1016/0268-4012(95)00045-9 · DOI
- Miller J. G.Living Systems. New York:McGraw‐Hill Co 1978.
- 10.1108/02640470010346021 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2000.tb06464.x · DOI
- Hunt R. E., 1997, Medical knowledge overload: a disturbing trend for physicians, Health Care Management Review, 22, 70
- 10.1136/bmj.317.7162.862 · DOI
- Imhoff M., 2001, &, 27, 179
- 10.1197/jamia.M1008 · DOI
- 10.1177/016555159902500305 · DOI
- 10.1177/016555158901500304 · DOI
- 10.1111/1467-8691.00128 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.315.7102.231 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.326.7382.196 · DOI · Paper page
- Cohn M., 1996, Politics, pragmatism and the information overload, Australian Family Physician, 25, 660
- 10.1046/j.1471-1842.2003.00422.x · DOI
- Hanka R., 1999, WAX ActiveLibrary: a tool to manage information overload, Topics in Health Information Management, 20, 69
- 10.1136/bmj.320.7228.160 · DOI
- 10.1108/00242539510147728 · DOI
- Kidd M., 1996, Coping with information overload—an IT solution to a major problem for general practitioners, Informatics in Healthcare—Australia, 5, 148
- 10.1016/S0933-3657(01)00074-4 · DOI
- Stefanelli M., 2002, Knowledge management to support performance‐based medicine, Methods of Information in Medicine, 41, 36, 10.1055/s-0038-1634311 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.318.7182.527 · DOI
- Rodrigues R. J., 2000, Information Systems: the key to evidence‐based practice, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 78, 1344
- Snyder‐Halpern R., 2001, Developing clinical practice environments supporting the knowledge work of nurses, Computers in Nursing, 19, 17
- Abidi S. S. R., 2001, IEEE Symposium of Computer Based Medical Systems, 5
- 10.1046/j.1365-2532.2000.00272.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2532.1999.00194-1.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00004650-199907000-00013 · DOI
- Carlson B., 1996, Technology offers an answer to ‘information overload’, Managed Care, 5, 45
- 10.1016/S1386-5056(01)00167-8 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.316.7132.673 · DOI
- Royce J., 1997, Surviving information overload: lessons from the reading reluctance research, School Libraries Worldwide, 3, 39, 10.29173/slw7013 · DOI
- 10.1145/567498.567516 · DOI
- Davidhizar, R., Shearer R., 2000, &, 21, 42
- 10.1097/00005110-199910000-00005 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005110-199907000-00008 · DOI
- McKinley C., 1997, SCAN: a survival tool for information overload, Journal of Rehabilitation Administration, 21, 45
- 10.1136/bmj.317.7162.832 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2532.2000.00286.x · DOI
- Childs S., 2004, Exploiting Knowledge in Health Services, 89
- 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1476 · DOI
- Reich V., Preserving Today's Scientific Record for Tomorrow, BMJ, 328, 61, 10.1136/bmj.328.7431.61 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009) · Health Information & Libraries Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x · Cited by 10,817
Information Overload: An Introduction
Bawden, D., & Robinson, L. (2020) · Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1360 · Cited by 249
Merriweather, Lyytinen, K., Aron, D., & Cauley, M. R. (2026) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-02243-4 · Cited by 9
“Another way to reduce cognitive load is to minimize the physician ’ s attention to extraneous information in the environment and decrease information overload 56 .”
Metadata
- Authors
- Hall, A., & Walton, G.
- Affiliations
- Northumbria University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hall, Amanda
- ORCID
- Walton, Graham
- Venue
- Health Information & Libraries Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-06
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 102-108
- ISSN
- 1471-1834 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-1842
- OpenAlex
- W2167017067
- Cited by
- 238
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 4.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- dspace.lboro.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Health Information & Libraries Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Loughborough University Research Repository (Loughborough University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Personal Information Management and User Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Electronic Health Records Systems
- Keywords
- information overload, clinical decision-making, information explosion, information complexity, clinical guidelines, journal access, research utilization, information filtering, information management, technical solutions
- MeSH terms
- Attitude of Health Personnel, Delivery of Health Care, Health Services Needs and Demand, Health Services Research, Humans, Medical Informatics, Physicians, Workload, Information Dissemination
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review