Cited by 18Teacher Education and Leadership StudiesCollaborative Teaching and InclusionEducation Pedagogy and Practices

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

School–university partnership in teacher education for inclusive education

Sigurdardóttir, Anna Kristín·2010·Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs

Abstract

This paper presents an initiative at the University of Iceland – School of Education aimed at developing school and university partnerships. The discussion addresses whether and how this reform could support inclusive teacher education. Teacher education in Iceland is currently under reconstruction because of new legislation, requiring a master's degree for teachers at all levels. As a part of this reconstruction, the School of Education is attempting to develop closer ties with Icelandic schools at different levels and with other stakeholders, both in regard to policy and practice. The partnership is underpinned by mutual commitment and responsibility. The main aims are to bridge the gap between theory and practice in student teacher learning and to encourage cooperation that might lead to school development as well as improvements in the teacher education programme. The project principally concerns four themes: teacher student learning; the associated schools; the university faculty and the content of courses; and finally, the partnership itself. The project is still in its initial stages though data are being collected along the way. To date, some preliminary data are available from two pilot studies.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2010.01160.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Bjarnadóttir R., 2008, Lærerliv sett med nordiske studentøjne, 18
  2. Bjarnason D. S., Special Education and Ethics: Collective Responsibility and Individual Rights
  3. Bolam R., 2005, Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities
  4. Darling Hammond L., 2005, Preparing Teachers for a Changing World, 390
  5. Edwards A., 2002, Rethinking Teacher Education: Collaborative Responses to Uncertainty
  6. 10.1080/03054980701450928 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/13639080020028747 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.003 · DOI
  9. Fræðslumiðstöð Reykjavíkur, 2000, Ársskýrsla fræðslumála í Reykjavík 2000
  10. 10.1207/s15326993es3803_7 · DOI
  11. 10.1111/j.0952-3383.2005.00377.x · DOI
  12. Gudjónsdóttir H., 2009, ‘ “Látum þúsund blóm blómstra”. Stefnumörkun um skóla án aðgreiningar’[Policy about inclusion], Uppeldi og menntun. Icelandic Journal of Education, 18, 61
  13. Helgadóttir S. J., 2006, Sérkennslukönnun í almennum grunnskólum vorið 2005 [Study in special education in compulsory schools, spring 2005]
  14. Jóhannsdóttir T., 2010, Cultural‐Historical Perspectives on Teacher Education and Development, 163
  15. Jónasson J. T., 2009, Alþýðufræðsla áÍslandi 1880–2007, 272
  16. Jónsdóttir L. M., 2005, Nám í nýju samhengi, 151
  17. 10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.010 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.tate.2006.04.022 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1080/02607470601098369 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.008 · DOI
  21. Marinósson G. L., 2007, Tálmar og tækifæri. Menntun nemenda meðþroskahömlun áÍslandi [Education of disability pupils in Iceland]
  22. 10.1016/j.tate.2009.02.008 · DOI
  23. Meijer C., 2003, Special Needs Education in Europe
  24. Menntasvið Reykjavíkurborgar, 2008, Stefna og starfsáætlun Menntasviðs Reykjavíkurborgar 2008
  25. Mulford W., 2004, Educational Leadership for Organisational Learning and Improved Student Outcomes, 10.1007/1-4020-2199-2 · DOI
  26. Senge P., 1990, The Fifth Discipline
  27. Sigurdardóttir A. K.(2006)Studying and Enhancing the Professional Learning Community for School Effectiveness in Iceland. PhD degree thesis The University of Exeter Exeter.
  28. Sigurdardóttir A. K. Bjarnadóttir R. Jónasson J.&Pétursdóttir S.(2009)Quality in Teacher Education through School‐University Partnership. Paper presented at the Teacher Education Policy in Europe (TEPE) annual conference at the University of Umeå in Sweden 18–20 May 2009.
  29. Stoll L., 2007, Professional Learning Communities: Divergence, Depth and Dilemmas

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Sigurdardóttir, A. K.
Venue
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-08
Volume
10
Issue
s1
Pages
149-156
ISSN
1471-3802 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1482787609
Cited by
18
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Teacher Education and Leadership Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Social Sciences › Education › Education Pedagogy and Practices
Keywords
university-school partnership, inclusive education, teacher professional development, theory-practice gap, pre-service teachers, teacher education reform, school development, course content

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review