Cited by 557

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices

Sharma, Umesh, Loreman, Tim, Forlin, Chris·2012·Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure perceived teacher efficacy to teach in inclusive classrooms. An 18‐item scale was developed on a sample of 607 pre‐service teachers selected from four countries (Canada, Australia, Hong Kong and India). Factor analysis of responses from the sample revealed three factors: efficacy in using inclusive instruction, efficacy in collaboration and efficacy in dealing with disruptive behaviours. The alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.89. Alpha coefficients for the three factors ranged from 0.85 to 0.93. Reliability analysis for the total scale as well as factors for each country suggested that the scale provides a reliable measure of pre‐service teacher perceptions of self‐efficacy for inclusion across different countries.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2011.01200.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Even in countries where inclusion has been practiced since the early 1980s, teacher education has invariably been slow to change to meet the new demands of an inclusive approach.

    “Even in countries where inclusion has been practiced since the early 1980s teacher education has invariably been slow to change to meet the new demands of an inclusive approach (Malakolunthu & Rengasamy, 2012;Sharma, Forlin, & Loreman, 2011).”

    From Reforming Teacher Education for Inclusion in Developing Countries in the Asia Pacific Region (2013) · cites this paper as Sharma, Forlin, & Loreman, 2011

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. 10.1080/08856250701267774 · DOI
  2. 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Barlett M. S., 1954, ‘A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x · DOI
  4. 10.1080/01443410701491833 · DOI
  5. 10.1177/109442810141004 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1080/02607470600982134 · DOI
  7. 10.1080/0144341970170401 · DOI
  8. Danielson C., 1996, Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching
  9. 10.1016/0742-051X(95)97311-9 · DOI
  10. Department of Education and Skills (DfES), 2004, Removing the Barriers to Achievement: Executive Summary
  11. DeVellis R. F., 2003, Scale Development
  12. 10.1080/13603110701365356 · DOI
  13. 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2005.00035.x · DOI
  15. 10.1177/109442819922004 · DOI
  16. Ho I. T.(2000)Teachers Thinking about Student Problem Behaviours and Management Strategies: a Comparative Study of Australian and Hong Kong Teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation The University of Sydney Australia.
  17. 10.1016/j.tate.2003.09.009 · DOI
  18. 10.1080/08856250500156038 · DOI
  19. 10.1080/13603110802377698 · DOI
  20. 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2007.00086.x · DOI
  21. 10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6 · DOI
  22. Lin H., 2001, ‘Pre‐service teachers efficacy beliefs in Taiwan, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 17
  23. 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00099-9 · DOI
  24. 10.1177/001440290507100301 · DOI
  25. Nunnally J. O., 1978, Psychometric Theory
  26. Oliver M.(1990)The individual and social models of disability. Paper presented at Joint Workshop of the Living Options Group and the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians Thames UK.
  27. Pallant J., 2009, SPSS Survival Manual
  28. Sarason S. B., 1990, The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform
  29. 10.1080/09687590802469271 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1080/13598660903050328 · DOI
  31. 10.1177/002246699803100405 · DOI
  32. Subban P., 2006, ‘Primary school teachers' perceptions of inclusive education in Victoria, Australia, International Journal of Special Education, 21, 42
  33. Tabachnick B. G., 2001, Using Multivariate Statistics
  34. 10.3102/00346543068002202 · DOI
  35. 10.1177/1746197906064677 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2006.00409.x · DOI
  37. 10.1016/0742-051X(90)90031-Y · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Wu‐Tien W., 2008, Reform, Inclusion & Teacher Education: Towards a New Era of Special Education in the Asia‐Pacific Region, 13

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C.
Venue
Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-03-31
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
12-21
ISSN
1471-3802
Cited by
557
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review