The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring teacher efficacy to implement inclusive practices
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to develop an instrument to measure perceived teacher efficacy to teach in inclusive classrooms. An 18‐item scale was developed on a sample of 607 pre‐service teachers selected from four countries (Canada, Australia, Hong Kong and India). Factor analysis of responses from the sample revealed three factors: efficacy in using inclusive instruction, efficacy in collaboration and efficacy in dealing with disruptive behaviours. The alpha coefficient for the total scale was 0.89. Alpha coefficients for the three factors ranged from 0.85 to 0.93. Reliability analysis for the total scale as well as factors for each country suggested that the scale provides a reliable measure of pre‐service teacher perceptions of self‐efficacy for inclusion across different countries.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Even in countries where inclusion has been practiced since the early 1980s, teacher education has invariably been slow to change to meet the new demands of an inclusive approach.
“Even in countries where inclusion has been practiced since the early 1980s teacher education has invariably been slow to change to meet the new demands of an inclusive approach (Malakolunthu & Rengasamy, 2012;Sharma, Forlin, & Loreman, 2011).”
From Reforming Teacher Education for Inclusion in Developing Countries in the Asia Pacific Region (2013) · cites this paper as Sharma, Forlin, & Loreman, 2011
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1 · Cited by 6,839 · cited 1×
“Researchers have therefore recommended that teacher efficacy should be examined in terms of task and context specificity (Tschannen-Moran and Hoy, 2001).”
BackgroundHenson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164405282485 · Cited by 2,454
Romi, S., & Leyser, Y. (2006) · European Journal of Special Needs Education · doi:10.1080/08856250500491880 · Cited by 225
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 39
- 10.1080/08856250701267774 · DOI
- 10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8 · DOI · Paper page
- Barlett M. S., 1954, ‘A note on the multiplying factors for various chi square approximations, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296, 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1954.tb00174.x · DOI
- 10.1080/01443410701491833 · DOI
- 10.1177/109442810141004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/02607470600982134 · DOI
- 10.1080/0144341970170401 · DOI
- Danielson C., 1996, Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching
- 10.1016/0742-051X(95)97311-9 · DOI
- Department of Education and Skills (DfES), 2004, Removing the Barriers to Achievement: Executive Summary
- DeVellis R. F., 2003, Scale Development
- 10.1080/13603110701365356 · DOI
- 10.1037/0022-0663.76.4.569 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2005.00035.x · DOI
- 10.1177/109442819922004 · DOI
- Ho I. T.(2000)Teachers Thinking about Student Problem Behaviours and Management Strategies: a Comparative Study of Australian and Hong Kong Teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation The University of Sydney Australia.
- 10.1016/j.tate.2003.09.009 · DOI
- 10.1080/08856250500156038 · DOI
- 10.1080/13603110802377698 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1471-3802.2007.00086.x · DOI
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr2403_6 · DOI
- Lin H., 2001, ‘Pre‐service teachers efficacy beliefs in Taiwan, Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32, 17
- 10.1016/S0742-051X(02)00099-9 · DOI
- 10.1177/001440290507100301 · DOI
- Nunnally J. O., 1978, Psychometric Theory
- Oliver M.(1990)The individual and social models of disability. Paper presented at Joint Workshop of the Living Options Group and the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians Thames UK.
- Pallant J., 2009, SPSS Survival Manual
- Sarason S. B., 1990, The Predictable Failure of Educational Reform
- 10.1080/09687590802469271 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13598660903050328 · DOI
- 10.1177/002246699803100405 · DOI
- Subban P., 2006, ‘Primary school teachers' perceptions of inclusive education in Victoria, Australia, International Journal of Special Education, 21, 42
- Tabachnick B. G., 2001, Using Multivariate Statistics
- 10.3102/00346543068002202 · DOI
- 10.1177/1746197906064677 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-9604.2006.00409.x · DOI
- 10.1016/0742-051X(90)90031-Y · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tate.2005.01.007 · DOI · Paper page
- Wu‐Tien W., 2008, Reform, Inclusion & Teacher Education: Towards a New Era of Special Education in the Asia‐Pacific Region, 13
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Guiding schools on their journey towards inclusion
Azorín, C., & Ainscow, M. (2020) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2018.1450900 · Cited by 187
Reforming Teacher Education for Inclusion in Developing Countries in the Asia Pacific Region
Faculty of Education, M. U., Sharma, U., Forlin, C., Faculty of Education and Human Development, H. K. I. O. E., Deppeler, J., Faculty of Education, M. U., Guang-xue, Y., & Faculty of Preschool & Special Education, E. C. N. U. (2013) · Asian Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.59595/ajie.01.1.2 · Cited by 153
Self-citationKeppens, K., Consuegra, E., De Maeyer, S., & Vanderlinde, R. (2021) · Journal of Curriculum Studies · doi:10.1080/00220272.2021.1881167 · Cited by 41
Evaluación de las prácticas inclusivas de docentes mexicanos de primaria y secundaria
(2023) · CHAKIÑAN Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades · doi:10.37135/chk.002.20.09 · Cited by 2
Faez, F., Karas, M., Specht, J., & Valdivia, C. (2026) · TESOL Journal · doi:10.1002/tesj.70129
Metadata
- Authors
- Sharma, U., Loreman, T., & Forlin, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-03-31
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 12-21
- ISSN
- 1471-3802
- Cited by
- 557
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review