The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Depression of Mesolimbic Dopamine Transmission and Sensitization to Morphine During Opiate Abstinence
Abstract
Abstract: To investigate the role of mesolimbic dopamine (DA) in the mechanism of drug dependence, extracellular DA was monitored by transcerebral dialysis in the caudal nucleus accumbens under basal conditions and after challenge with morphine (5 mg/kg s.c.) in control rats and in rats made dependent on and then deprived of morphine. Withdrawal from morphine resulted in a marked reduction of extracellular DA concentrations from control values at 1, 2, 3, and 5 days of withdrawal. After 7 days of withdrawal, DA output was less, but still significantly, reduced. Challenge with morphine resulted in stimulation of DA output in controls (maximum, 35%), no effect on the first day of withdrawal, and stimulation similar to controls’ on days 2 and 7 of withdrawal. On day 5 and, particularly, on day 3 of withdrawal, morphine‐induced stimulation of DA output was markedly potentiated (maximum, 100 and 160%, respectively). Changes in the sensitivity of DA transmission to morphine challenge were associated with changes in the behavioral stimulant effects of morphine, with tolerance on day 1 and marked sensitization on days 3 and 5 but also on day 7, when morphine‐induced stimulation of transmission was no longer potentiated. The results indicate that repeated morphine administration induces a state of dependence in DA neurons and a short‐lasting tolerance followed by an increased sensitivity to its stimulant effects on DA transmission. These changes might play an important role in the development of opiate addiction and in the maintenance of opiate self‐administration in dependent subjects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Di Chiara, G., & Imperato, A. (1988) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.85.14.5274 · Cited by 4,733
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of drug dependence
Koob, G. F., & Bloom, F. E. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2903550 · Cited by 2,070
Cited by
Avena, N. M., Rada, P., & Hoebel, B. G. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.04.019 · Cited by 1,358
Nucleus accumbens shell and core dopamine: differential role in behavior and addiction
Di Chiara, G. (2002) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00286-3 · Cited by 996
Cellular and Synaptic Adaptations Mediating Opioid Dependence
Williams, J. T., Christie, M. J., & Manzoni, O. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.1.299 · Cited by 848
Neurobiological similarities in depression and drug dependence: a self-medication hypothesis
Markou, A. (1998) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(97)00113-9 · Cited by 767
Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system
Tzschentke, T. M. (2001) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/s0301-0082(00)00033-2 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Acquas, E., & Di Chiara, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1992-05
- Volume
- 58
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1620-1625
- ISSN
- 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-4159
- OpenAlex
- W2072193559
- Cited by
- 223
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Depression of Mesolimbic Dopamine Transmission and Sensitization to Morphine During Opiate Abstinence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10033.x
- The paper
- Acquas, E., & Di Chiara, G. (1992). Depression of Mesolimbic Dopamine Transmission and Sensitization to Morphine During Opiate Abstinence. Journal of Neurochemistry. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-4159.1992.tb10033.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.