Cited by 56Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsCellular Mechanics and Interactions

A τ Fragment Containing a Repetitive Sequence Induces Bundling of Actin Filaments

Open access
Moraga, Daniel M., Nuñez, Patricio, Garrido, Jorge, Maccioni, Ricardo B.·1993·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

Abstract: Much indirect evidence suggests that the interconnections of actin microfilaments with the microtubule system are mediated by microtubule‐associated proteins (MAPs). In this study we provide new data to support the interaction of a specific tubulin‐binding domain on τ with actin in vitro. In actin polymerization assays, the synthetic peptide VRSKIGSTENLKHQPGGG, corresponding to the first repetitive sequence of τ protein, increased turbidity at 320 nm in a dose‐dependent fashion. A salient feature of the τ peptide‐induced assembly process is the formation of a large amount of actin filament bundles, as revealed by electron microscopic analysis. An increase in the τ peptide concentration resulted in a proportional increase in the bundling of actin filaments. It is interesting that a gradual decrease of pH within the range 7.6–4.7 resulted in a higher effect of τ peptide in promoting bundles of actin filaments. A similar pH‐dependent effect was observed for τ protein‐induced bundling. An analysis of the mechanisms that operate in the peptide induction of actin filament bundles suggests the involvement of electrostatic forces, because the neutralization of ɛ‐aminolysyl residues by selective carbamoylation resulted in a complete loss of the peptide induction of actin bundles. The data suggest that a τ repetitive sequence (also found in MAP‐2 and MAP‐4) containing a common tubulin binding motif may constitute a functional domain on τ for the dynamics of the interconnections between actin filaments and microtu‐bules.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1993.tb03611.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moraga, D. M., Nuñez, P., Garrido, J., & Maccioni, R. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Chile (CL)
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (CL)
Corresponding author
Maccioni, Ricardo B.
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1993-09
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
979-986
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1971771942
Cited by
56
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Universidad de Chile (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
Keywords
tau protein, repetitive DNA, actin bundling, actin polymerization, microtubule-associated proteins, actin-microtubule interaction, pH dependence, electrostatic interactions, carbamoylation, MAP2
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Chickens, Cyanates, Microscopy, Electron, Nephelometry and Turbidimetry, Peptide Fragments, Peptide Mapping, Polymers, tau Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review