Static, transient and permanent organization of GABAA receptor expression in calbindin‐positive interneurons in response to amygdala kindled seizures
Abstract
We tested the hypothesis that experimentally produced epilepsy (by kindling) may induce changes in GABA A receptor expression in some but not all interneuron populations. Using laser capture microdissection and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (QPCR) analysis, GABA A receptor α subunit expression in calbindin‐ (CB ir) and parvalbumin‐ (Parv ir) immunoreactive interneurons was compared between normal brains and brains in which amygdala kindled seizure responses were permanently established. Two weeks after the last seizure response, Cb ir neurons in the hilus and/or perirhinal cortex up‐regulated the expression of α 2, α 3 and α 5 subunit mRNAs up to 900%. In contrast, no changes were found in Parv ir neurons. In Cb ir neurons contralateral to the amygdala kindling site α1 subunit mRNA expression was increased. In both Cb ir and Parv ir neurons, the coordinated subunit expression patterns ipsilateral (fully kindled) and contralateral (partially kindled) to the kindling site suggested that permanent and transient co‐expressional relationships occur respectively. In the perirhinal cortex α2 protein was up‐regulated in the processes but not in the cell somas of calbindin‐positive neurons, whereas α3 subunit protein expression was up‐regulated on the cell bodies of Cb ir neurons in the hilus. These data indicate that different interneuron populations may selectively reorganize their GABA A subunit expression in response to seizures.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Until recently, cell type based expression profiling in the brain mainly relied on physical enrichment of target cell populations such as laser capture microdissection, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, or manual sorting.
“Until recently, cell type based expression profiling in the brain has mainly relied on physical enrichment of target cell population such as laser capture microdissection (Meguro et al., 2004, Rossner et al., 2006), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Tomomura et al., 2001, Lobo et al., 2006), or manual sorting (Sugino et al., 2006).”
From Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Meguro et al., 2004
Cites
DeFelipe, J. (1997) · Journal of Chemical Neuroanatomy · doi:10.1016/s0891-0618(97)10013-8 · Cited by 550 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain
He, M., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, M. Q., Hannon, G. J., & Huang, Z. J. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.010 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Wiltgen, B. (2009) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.08.037.2009 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
Molecular neuroanatomy: a generation of progress
Pollock, J. D., Wu, D.-Y., & Satterlee, J. S. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.11.001 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meguro, R., Lu, J., Gavrilovici, C., & Poulter, M. O.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurochemistry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-09-06
- Volume
- 91
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 144-154
- ISSN
- 0022-3042
- 1471-4159
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review