Cited by 81Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchNeurobiology and Insect Physiology Research

Drosophila models of human tauopathies indicate that Tau protein toxicity in vivo is mediated by soluble cytosolic phosphorylated forms of the protein

Feuillette, Sébastien, Miguel, Laetitia, Frébourg, Thierry, Campion, Dominique, Lecourtois, Magalie·2010·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

J. Neurochem. (2010) 113, 895–903. Tau is a neuronal microtubule‐associated protein involved in microtubules assembly and stabilization. Tauopathies, including Alzheimer’s disease and fronto‐temporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, are a group of neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the presence of intraneuronal filamentous inclusions of abnormally and hyperphosphorylated Tau. Currently, the molecular mechanisms underlying Tau‐mediated cellular toxicity remain elusive. To address the determinants of Tau neurotoxicity, we used Drosophila models of human tauopathies to study the microtubule‐binding properties of human Tau proteins in vivo. We showed that, in contrast to endogenous Drosophila Tau, human Tau proteins bind very poorly to microtubules in Drosophila, and are mostly recovered as soluble cytosolic hyperphosphorylated species. This weak binding of human Tau to microtubules is neither because of microtubules saturation nor competition with endogenous Drosophila Tau, but clearly depends on its phosphorylation degree. We also reported that accumulation of cytosolic hyperphosphorylated forms of human Tau proteins correlates with human Tau‐mediated neurodegeneration in flies, supporting the key role of soluble cytosolic hyperphosphorylated Tau proteins as toxic species in vivo.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06663.x

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Feuillette, S., Miguel, L., Frébourg, T., Campion, D., & Lecourtois, M.
Affiliations
Inserm (FR)
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-04-14
Volume
113
Issue
4
Pages
895-903
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W2014552449
Cited by
81
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
Keywords
tau protein, tauopathy, Drosophila model, hyperphosphorylated tau, microtubule binding, neurotoxicity, Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Animals, Inclusion Bodies, Cytosol, Disease Models, Animal, Drosophila melanogaster, Female, Humans, Male, Microscopy, Electron, Microtubules, Nervous System, Neurons, Phosphorylation, Protein Binding, Solubility, tau Proteins, Tauopathies, Animals, Genetically Modified

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review