Cited by 92Genetic Neurodegenerative DiseasesAutophagy in Disease and TherapyLysosomal Storage Disorders Research

Induction of autophagy with catalytic mTOR inhibitors reduces huntingtin aggregates in a neuronal cell model

Roscic, Ana, Baldo, Barbara, Crochemore, Christophe, Marcellin, David, Paganetti, Paolo·2011·Journal of Neurochemistry

Abstract

J. Neurochem. (2011) 119 , 398–407. Huntington’s disease is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder caused by a CAG trinucleotide repeat expansion in the huntingtin gene. This expansion produces a mutant form of the huntingtin protein, which contains an elongated polyglutamine stretch at its amino‐terminus. Mutant huntingtin may adopt an aberrant, aggregation‐prone conformation predicted to start the pathogenic process leading to neuronal dysfunction and cell death. Thus, strategies reducing mutant huntingtin may lead to disease‐modifying therapies. We investigated the mechanisms and molecular targets regulating huntingtin degradation in a neuronal cell model. We first found that mutant and wild‐type huntingtin displayed strikingly diverse turn‐over kinetics and sensitivity to proteasome inhibition. Then, we show that autophagy induction led to accelerate degradation of mutant huntingtin aggregates. In our neuronal cell model, allosteric inhibition of mTORC1 by everolimus, a rapamycin analogue, did not induce autophagy or affect aggregate degradation. In contrast, this occurred in the presence of catalytic inhibitors of both mTOR complexes mTORC1 and mTORC2. Our data demonstrate the existence of an mTOR‐dependent but everolimus‐independent mechanism regulating autophagy and huntingtin‐aggregate degradation in cells of neuronal origin.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07435.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Selective MTORC1 inhibition via everolimus or modulation of MTOR- and AKT-independent pathways with 10-NCP are more successful in neurons.

    “Alternative methods have proven more successful in neurons, however, including selective MTORC1 inhibition via everolimus [385–387], or modulation of MTOR- and AKT-independent pathways with 10-NCP, an N10-substituted derivative of the heterocyclic dye compound and antipsychotic analog phenoxazine [384].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Roscic, A., Baldo, B., Crochemore, C., Marcellin, D., & Paganetti, P.
Affiliations
Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
Journal of Neurochemistry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-09-20
Volume
119
Issue
2
Pages
398-407
ISSN
  • 0022-3042 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-4159
OpenAlex
W1904622810
Cited by
92
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Neurochemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Lysosomal Storage Disorders Research
Keywords
Huntington's disease, mutant huntingtin, huntingtin aggregates, autophagy, mTOR inhibitors, mTORC1, mTORC2, everolimus, proteasome inhibition, protein degradation, polyglutamine, neuronal cell model, disease-modifying therapy
MeSH terms
Everolimus, Huntingtin Protein, Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1, Autophagy, Cells, Cultured, Exons, Humans, Immunoassay, Immunosuppressive Agents, Kinetics, Models, Neurological, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Nuclear Proteins, Proteins, RNA, Messenger, Blotting, Western, Sirolimus, Multiprotein Complexes, TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review