The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are Women Evaluated More Favorably Than Men?: An Analysis of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Emotions
Abstract
In an experiment in which male and female respondents evaluated the social category of women or men on several types of measures, analysis of respondents' attitudes toward the sexes and of the evaluative content of their beliefs established that they evaluated women more favorably than men. In addition, analysis of respondents' emotional reactions toward women and men did not yield evidence of negativity toward women at the emotional level. Nor did it appear that respondents' very positive evaluations of women masked ambivalence toward them. This research, therefore, provides strong evidence that women are evaluated quite favorably—in fact, more favorably than men.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Russell, J. A. (1980) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077714 · Cited by 16,334
Gender Stereotypes and Attitudes Toward Women and Men
Eagly, A. H., & Mladinic, A. (1989) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167289154008 · Cited by 785
Self-citation
Cited by
Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.102.1.4 · Cited by 6,682
The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism.
Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.70.3.491 · Cited by 5,202
The role of stereotyping in system‐justification and the production of false consciousness
Jost, J. T., & Banaji, M. R. (1994) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1994.tb01008.x · Cited by 3,290
Models of the self: Self-construals and gender.
Cross, S. E., & Madson, L. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.122.1.5 · Cited by 2,585
Sexism and racism: Old-fashioned and modern prejudices
Swim, J. K., Aikin, K. J., Hall, W. S., & Hunter, B. A. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.199 · Cited by 1,486
Metadata
- Authors
- Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S.
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 203-216
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2121643969
- Cited by
- 304
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 14.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are Women Evaluated More Favorably Than Men?: An Analysis of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Emotions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00792.x
- The paper
- Eagly, A. H., Mladinic, A., & Otto, S. (1991). Are Women Evaluated More Favorably Than Men?: An Analysis of Attitudes, Beliefs, and Emotions. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1991.tb00792.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
