The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Understanding Women's Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices
Abstract
Despite recent efforts to increase the participation of women in advanced educational training and high-status professional fields, women and men are still concentrated in different occupations and educational programs, and women are still underrepresented in many high-status occupational fields—particularly those associated with physical science, engineering, and applied mathematics. Many factors, ranging from outright discrimination to the processes associated with gender role socialization, contribute to these gendered patterns of educational and occupational choices. This paper summarizes a set of social and psychological factors that Eccles and her colleagues have been studying for the past 15 years in an effort to understand the occupational and educational choices of women and men. The paper summarizes the key features of the theoretical model they developed and provides an overview of the empirical support now available for key aspects of this model. The implications of this model for understanding the link between gender roles and gendered educational and occupational decisions are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences
Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D. (1990) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1990.tb01929.x · Cited by 815
Self-citation
Cited by
Wilson, F., Kickul, J., & Marlino, D. (2007) · Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x · Cited by 1,983
Cross-national patterns of gender differences in mathematics: A meta-analysis.
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0018053 · Cited by 1,630
ECCLES, J. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520902832368 · Cited by 1,444
Self-citationGender Similarities and Differences
Hyde, J. S. (2014) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115057 · Cited by 1,262
Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?
Cheryan, S., Ziegler, S. A., Montoya, A. K., & Jiang, L. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000052 · Cited by 1,259
Metadata
- Authors
- Eccles, J. S.
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 585-609
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2159528852
- Cited by
- 1,291
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 16.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Understanding Women's Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x
- The paper
- Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding Women's Educational And Occupational Choices: Applying the Eccles et al. Model of Achievement-Related Choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.