Gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, and parents' socialization of gender differences
Abstract
Gender segregation continues to exist in many activity and occupational domains. This article uses the expectancy effect perspective to analyze the role parents may play in influencing their children to engage in gender role stereotyped activities. It outlines the theoretical bases for such effects, and discusses how to distinguish between accuracy and perceptual bias in parents' gender role differentiated perceptions of their children's competencies and interests. Then it summarizes the results of a series of studies, which show that parents distort their perceptions of their own children in gender role stereotypic activities such as math and sports, that the child's gender affects parents' causal attributions for their children's performance in gender role stereotypic activities, and that these perceptual biases influence the children's own self‐perceptions and activity choices. Finally, the article presents a theoretical model of how these processes may occur.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Parents view their sons as more competent in math and their daughters as better in language arts.
“perhaps because parents view their sons as more competent in math as opposed to their daughters who they view as better in language arts (Eccles et al., 1990).”
From Gender and Education (2015) · cites this paper as Eccles et al., 1990
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,542 · see citing works
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.100.3.363 · Cited by 9,564 · see citing works
Objectification Theory: Toward Understanding Women's Lived Experiences and Mental Health Risks
Fredrickson, B. L., & Roberts, T.-A. (1997) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00108.x · Cited by 5,531 · see citing works
The Social Psychology of Stigma
Major, B., & O'Brien, L. T. (2005) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070137 · Cited by 3,114 · see citing works
Signaling Threat: How Situational Cues Affect Women in Math, Science, and Engineering Settings
Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x · Cited by 1,048 · see citing works
Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013) · Developmental Review · doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001 · Cited by 837 · see citing works
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014) · Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1177/2372732214549471 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: their effects on women's performance
Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0022-1031(02)00508-5 · Cited by 386 · see citing works
Cognitive vulnerability to depression: a dual process model
Beevers, C. G. (2005) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2005.03.003 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Problems in the pipeline: stereotype threat and women's achievement in high-level math courses
Good, C., Aronson, J., & Harder, J. A. (2008) · Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2007.10.004 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
The role of gender in the perception of autism symptom severity and future behavioral development
Geelhand, P., Bernard, P., Klein, O., van Tiel, B., & Kissine, M. (2019) · Molecular Autism · doi:10.1186/s13229-019-0266-4 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
The detrimental effects of a suggestion of sexism in an instruction situation
Adams, G., Garcia, D. M., Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Steele, C. M. (2006) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.10.004 · Cited by 122 · see citing works
Men, women and STEM: Why the differences and what should be done?
Stewart-Williams, S., & Halsey, L. G. (2021) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1177/0890207020962326 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
von Hippel, C., Sekaquaptewa, D., & McFarlane, M. (2015) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0361684315574501 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Pahlke, E., & Goble, P. (2015) · International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.92151-2 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Eccles, J. S., Jacobs, J. E., & Harold, R. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Boulder (US)
- University of Michigan (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eccles, Jacquelynne S.
- Venue
- Journal of Social Issues
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1990-07
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-201
- ISSN
- 0022-4537 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-4560
- OpenAlex
- W2124109620
- Cited by
- 815
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 75 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 11.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Social Issues (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender Roles and Identity Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
- Keywords
- gender role stereotypes, expectancy effects, parental socialization, gender segregation, causal attribution, children's self-perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
