The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sexual Assault Education Programs: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Their Effectiveness
Abstract
Meta-analyses of the effectiveness of college sexual assault education programs on seven outcome measure categories were conducted using 69 studies that involved 102 treatment interventions and 18,172 participants. Five of the outcome categories had significant average effect sizes (i.e., rape attitudes, rape-related attitudes, rape knowledge, behavioral intent, and incidence of sexual assault), while the outcome areas of rape empathy and rape awareness behaviors did not have average effect sizes that differed from zero. A significant finding of this study is that longer interventions are more effective than brief interventions in altering both rape attitudes and rape-related attitudes. Moderator analyses also suggest that the content of programming, type of presenter, gender of the audience, and type of audience may also be associated with greater program effectiveness. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research
Rosenthal, R. (1991) · doi:10.4135/9781412984997 · Cited by 4,635
Koss, M. P., Gidycz, C. A., & Wisniewski, N. (1987) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-006x.55.2.162 · Cited by 2,602
Cited by
Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., & Berkowitz, A. D. (2011) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801211409727 · Cited by 555
Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention.
Banyard, V. L. (2011) · Psychology of Violence · doi:10.1037/a0023739 · Cited by 369
A meta-analysis of universal mental health prevention programs for higher education students
Conley, C. S., Durlak, J. A., & Kirsch, A. C. (2015) · Prevention Science · doi:10.1007/s11121-015-0543-1 · Cited by 340
Myths about male rape: A literature review.
Turchik, J. A., & Edwards, K. M. (2012) · Psychology of Men & Masculinity · doi:10.1037/a0023207 · Cited by 265
Why Sexual Assault Survivors Do Not Report to Universities: A Feminist Analysis
Spencer, C., Mallory, A., Toews, M., Stith, S., & Wood, L. (2017) · Family Relations · doi:10.1111/fare.12241 · Cited by 121
Metadata
- Authors
- Anderson, L. A., & Whiston, S. C.
- Venue
- Psychology of Women Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 374-388
- ISSN
- 0361-6843 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-6402
- OpenAlex
- W2156977801
- Cited by
- 526
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sexual Assault Education Programs: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Their Effectiveness. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x
- The paper
- Anderson, L. A., & Whiston, S. C. (2005). Sexual Assault Education Programs: A Meta-Analytic Examination of Their Effectiveness. Psychology of Women Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00237.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
